Pro-Environment Being and Ecological Attachments

Juneman Abraham, Any Rufaedah
{"title":"Pro-Environment Being and Ecological Attachments","authors":"Juneman Abraham, Any Rufaedah","doi":"10.21834/AJBES.V3I10.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research related five attachment objects altogether, i.e. home attachment, neighborhood cohesion, workplace/campus attachment, city attachment, and national identity, with general pro-environmental behavior. Additional analysis included prejudice toward pro-environmental activists and psycho-socio-demographic profiles as explanatory variables. The participants were 262 urban young adults (121 males, 141 females; M age = 30.09 years, SD age = 9.82 years) who are citizens of Jakarta and its surrounding areas. The result showed that the higher the attachment to, consecutively, workplace/campus, city, and neighborhood, the higher the general pro-environmental behavior. Home attachment, national identity, and prejudice toward pro-environmental activists could not predict pro-environmental behavior. Keywords: pro-environment; community; attachment; urban psychology eISSN  2398-4295 © 2018. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.","PeriodicalId":375403,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Consumer Ethics Issues (Topic)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Consumer Ethics Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21834/AJBES.V3I10.86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research related five attachment objects altogether, i.e. home attachment, neighborhood cohesion, workplace/campus attachment, city attachment, and national identity, with general pro-environmental behavior. Additional analysis included prejudice toward pro-environmental activists and psycho-socio-demographic profiles as explanatory variables. The participants were 262 urban young adults (121 males, 141 females; M age = 30.09 years, SD age = 9.82 years) who are citizens of Jakarta and its surrounding areas. The result showed that the higher the attachment to, consecutively, workplace/campus, city, and neighborhood, the higher the general pro-environmental behavior. Home attachment, national identity, and prejudice toward pro-environmental activists could not predict pro-environmental behavior. Keywords: pro-environment; community; attachment; urban psychology eISSN  2398-4295 © 2018. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open-access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲环境存在与生态依恋
本研究将家庭依恋、邻里凝聚力、职场/校园依恋、城市依恋和民族认同五个依恋对象与亲环境行为进行了综合研究。其他分析包括对亲环境活动家的偏见和心理-社会-人口特征作为解释变量。研究对象为262名城市青年(男性121人,女性141人;男性年龄= 30.09岁,女性年龄= 9.82岁),均为雅加达及其周边地区的公民。结果表明,对工作场所/校园、城市和社区的依恋程度越高,总体亲环境行为越高。家庭依恋、国家认同和对亲环境活动者的偏见不能预测亲环境行为。关键词:环保;社区;附件;城市心理学eISSN 2398-4295©2018。作者。英国e-International Publishing House, Ltd.为AMER ABRA cE-Bs出版。这是一篇基于CC BY-NC-ND许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)的开放获取文章。由马来西亚玛拉理工大学建筑、规划与测量学院AMER(马来西亚环境行为研究协会)、ABRA(亚洲行为研究协会)和cE-Bs(环境行为研究中心)负责的同行评审。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Hospice spiritual care and suffering: towards a theodicy of suffering
IF 0 ContactPub Date : 2000-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/13520806.2000.11758892
Guy Harrison
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Do Cross-country Surveys Tell Us About Social Capital? Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in Tourism and Hospitality Pro-Environment Being and Ecological Attachments Awareness Towards Impact of Festivals on Ecology: Need for Social Work Intervention The Importance of Consumer Trust for the Emergence of a Market for Organic Food: The Case of Thailand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1