Opening the Black Box of a Corporation in Dispute: Manager – Lawyer Coproduction of Response to Business Conflict

A. Borbely, Erik Wetter
{"title":"Opening the Black Box of a Corporation in Dispute: Manager – Lawyer Coproduction of Response to Business Conflict","authors":"A. Borbely, Erik Wetter","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1872131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Companies in dispute vary both in how systematically they consider negotiated dispute resolution and in how their legal and decision-making functions interact with each other. Approaching business conflict resolution as a professional service leads to the adoption of new agency assumptions for the study of within-party manager-lawyer relationships in conflict settings and their possible impact on the organization’s propensity to use ADR. When we consider that conflict resolution is not a task clients simply delegate to lawyers but that the two categories will actually craft response to conflict in coproduction with each other, we are able to isolate new internal barriers to conflict resolution. Based on exploratory qualitative data, this contribution explores the notion of coproduction in conflict resolution. It isolates the different lawyer-manager coproduction schemes and drafts a first list of their determinants (structural, organizational and personal). All of this aims to reflect on different ways to increase consideration for ADR in conflict resolution strategy phases, with the idea that for negotiated dispute resolution to take ground in organizations, some organizational change may prove necessary.","PeriodicalId":193303,"journal":{"name":"IACM 2011 Istanbul Conference (Archive)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IACM 2011 Istanbul Conference (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1872131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Companies in dispute vary both in how systematically they consider negotiated dispute resolution and in how their legal and decision-making functions interact with each other. Approaching business conflict resolution as a professional service leads to the adoption of new agency assumptions for the study of within-party manager-lawyer relationships in conflict settings and their possible impact on the organization’s propensity to use ADR. When we consider that conflict resolution is not a task clients simply delegate to lawyers but that the two categories will actually craft response to conflict in coproduction with each other, we are able to isolate new internal barriers to conflict resolution. Based on exploratory qualitative data, this contribution explores the notion of coproduction in conflict resolution. It isolates the different lawyer-manager coproduction schemes and drafts a first list of their determinants (structural, organizational and personal). All of this aims to reflect on different ways to increase consideration for ADR in conflict resolution strategy phases, with the idea that for negotiated dispute resolution to take ground in organizations, some organizational change may prove necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打开纠纷公司的黑匣子:经理人与律师合作应对商业冲突
有争议的公司在如何系统地考虑谈判解决争议以及他们的法律和决策功能如何相互作用方面各不相同。将商业冲突解决作为一种专业服务,导致采用新的代理假设来研究冲突环境中当事人内部经理-律师关系及其对组织使用ADR倾向的可能影响。当我们考虑到解决冲突不是客户简单地委托给律师的任务,而是这两个类别实际上会在相互合作的过程中对冲突做出反应时,我们就能够隔离解决冲突的新内部障碍。基于探索性定性数据,本文探讨了冲突解决中合作生产的概念。它隔离了不同的律师-经理合作计划,并起草了第一份决定因素(结构、组织和个人)的清单。所有这些都旨在反思在冲突解决战略阶段增加对ADR的考虑的不同方法,并认为为了使协商争端解决在组织中扎根,可能需要进行一些组织变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Implications of Value Conflict: How Disagreement on Values Affects Self-Involvement and Perceived Common Ground The Relational Costs of Complete Contracts When Vigilance Prevails: Regulatory Focus in Negotiations with External Goals Opening the Black Box of a Corporation in Dispute: Manager – Lawyer Coproduction of Response to Business Conflict Behavioral and Emotional Reactions to Voice Unanswered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1