Perbandingan Prestasi Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPS Sebelum Penerimaan Peserta Didik Baru (PPDB) Sistem Zonasi dan Setelah Berlakunya Sistem Zonasi

Adisel Adisel, Fautina Sundari
{"title":"Perbandingan Prestasi Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPS Sebelum Penerimaan Peserta Didik Baru (PPDB) Sistem Zonasi dan Setelah Berlakunya Sistem Zonasi","authors":"Adisel Adisel, Fautina Sundari","doi":"10.31539/joeai.v5i1.3593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to determine the comparison of student achievement in social studies subjects before the acceptance of new students (PPDB) zoning system and after the enactment of the zoning system at SMPN 2 Bengkulu City. The research method used is a quantitative method with a comparative approach. A sample of 100 students, consisting of 50 students from before the admission of new students (PPDB) zoning system and 50 students after the enactment of the zoning system, was taken by random sampling technique. and the 2020/2021 academic year where the report card scores are taken from the UAS results. Analyzed using prerequisite tests consisting of data normality test, data homogeneity and then hypothesis testing. The results of the study were that there were differences in student achievement in social studies subjects before the acceptance of new students (PPDB) with the zoning system and after the enactment of the zoning system at SMPN 2 Bengkulu City. This is based on the \"z\" test on the UAS scores of students in both groups, obtained zcount = 5.586 while ttable = 1.65 at a significant level of 5% which is 1.6, thus zcount > ttable (1.6 > 5.586) which means the hypothesis (Ha) in this study was accepted. In conclusion, there are differences in learning achievement in social studies subjects before the admission of new students (PPDB) zoning system and after the enactment of the zoning system at SMPN 2 Bengkulu City. \nKeywords: Student Achievement, New Student Admission (PPDB) Zoning System","PeriodicalId":120998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v5i1.3593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the comparison of student achievement in social studies subjects before the acceptance of new students (PPDB) zoning system and after the enactment of the zoning system at SMPN 2 Bengkulu City. The research method used is a quantitative method with a comparative approach. A sample of 100 students, consisting of 50 students from before the admission of new students (PPDB) zoning system and 50 students after the enactment of the zoning system, was taken by random sampling technique. and the 2020/2021 academic year where the report card scores are taken from the UAS results. Analyzed using prerequisite tests consisting of data normality test, data homogeneity and then hypothesis testing. The results of the study were that there were differences in student achievement in social studies subjects before the acceptance of new students (PPDB) with the zoning system and after the enactment of the zoning system at SMPN 2 Bengkulu City. This is based on the "z" test on the UAS scores of students in both groups, obtained zcount = 5.586 while ttable = 1.65 at a significant level of 5% which is 1.6, thus zcount > ttable (1.6 > 5.586) which means the hypothesis (Ha) in this study was accepted. In conclusion, there are differences in learning achievement in social studies subjects before the admission of new students (PPDB) zoning system and after the enactment of the zoning system at SMPN 2 Bengkulu City. Keywords: Student Achievement, New Student Admission (PPDB) Zoning System
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新学习者(PPDB)接受之前,以及之后的分区制度,在IPS科目上比较学生的学习成绩
本研究的目的是确定在接受新生(PPDB)分区制度之前和制定分区制度之后,SMPN 2 Bengkulu市社会研究科目的学生成绩的比较。本文采用的研究方法是定量方法与比较方法相结合。采用随机抽样的方法,抽取100名学生为样本,其中50名学生为分区制实施前的学生,50名学生为分区制实施后的学生。以及2020/2021学年,成绩单分数取自UAS成绩。采用数据正态性检验、数据同质性检验和假设检验组成的前提检验进行分析。研究结果表明,在分区制度下接受新生之前和分区制度颁布后,SMPN 2 Bengkulu市的社会研究科目的学生成绩存在差异。这是基于对两组学生的UAS成绩进行“z”检验,得到zcount = 5.586,而表= 1.65,显著水平为5%,即1.6,因此zcount >表(1.6 > 5.586),这意味着接受本研究的假设(Ha)。综上所述,在新生入学分区制度实施前和实施分区制度后,本古鲁市SMPN 2的社会研究科目的学习成绩存在差异。关键词:学生成绩,新生录取(PPDB)分区制度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pengembangan LKPD Berbasis Web pada Materi Kingdom Animalia untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Peningkatan Kemampuan Berbicara Bahasa Arab Siswa Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Melalui Thariqah Mubasyarah Strategi Active Learning Tipe Everyone Is A Teacher Here (Eth) Berbasis Quiz terhadap Hasil Belajar Kreativitas Guru untuk Memanfaatkan Media Pembelajaran pada Bahasa Inggris What Delicious Bakso ! Pencampuran Warna dalam Finger Painting pada Kelompok B di RA Al Anwar Kota Kediri
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1