Formal models for the verification, performance evaluation, and comparison of IoT communication protocols

Imene Ben Hafaiedh
{"title":"Formal models for the verification, performance evaluation, and comparison of IoT communication protocols","authors":"Imene Ben Hafaiedh","doi":"10.1109/NCA57778.2022.10013626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the IoT performs important functions in several diverse applications. As a consequence of such diversity, there are also several issues to deal with, and the communication of devices is one of these prominent challenges. Due to its heterogeneity, the communication of IoT devices is an eminent system function, and, thus, distinct communication protocols have been proposed for these systems. Even under the same operating conditions, the performance of these protocols can differ significantly. In this paper, we present a performance evaluation of IoT communication protocols for the application layer. We address the problem of the efficiency of IoT protocols by means of a formal model-based approach, which encompasses features of various protocols and aims at analyzing and comparing the performance of these protocols. The proposed models have been proven useful by considering the verification and comparison of three well-known IoT communication protocols, namely MQTT, AMQP and CoAP protocols.","PeriodicalId":251728,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA)","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NCA57778.2022.10013626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, the IoT performs important functions in several diverse applications. As a consequence of such diversity, there are also several issues to deal with, and the communication of devices is one of these prominent challenges. Due to its heterogeneity, the communication of IoT devices is an eminent system function, and, thus, distinct communication protocols have been proposed for these systems. Even under the same operating conditions, the performance of these protocols can differ significantly. In this paper, we present a performance evaluation of IoT communication protocols for the application layer. We address the problem of the efficiency of IoT protocols by means of a formal model-based approach, which encompasses features of various protocols and aims at analyzing and comparing the performance of these protocols. The proposed models have been proven useful by considering the verification and comparison of three well-known IoT communication protocols, namely MQTT, AMQP and CoAP protocols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于验证、性能评估和物联网通信协议比较的正式模型
目前,物联网在许多不同的应用中发挥着重要的作用。由于这种多样性,也有一些问题需要处理,设备的通信是这些突出的挑战之一。由于其异构性,物联网设备的通信是一项重要的系统功能,因此,针对这些系统提出了不同的通信协议。即使在相同的操作条件下,这些协议的性能也会有很大差异。在本文中,我们提出了应用层物联网通信协议的性能评估。我们通过一种基于正式模型的方法来解决物联网协议的效率问题,该方法包含各种协议的特征,旨在分析和比较这些协议的性能。通过对MQTT、AMQP和CoAP三种知名物联网通信协议的验证和比较,证明了所提出模型的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SixPack v2: enhancing SixPack to avoid last generation misbehavior detectors in VANETs LoCaaS: Location-Certification-as-a-Service Detecting Causality in the Presence of Byzantine Processes: There is No Holy Grail Formal models for the verification, performance evaluation, and comparison of IoT communication protocols Swarming with (Visual) Secret (Shared) Mission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1