Applications of object detection in modular construction based on a comparative evaluation of deep learning algorithms

Chang Liu, S. Sepasgozar, S. Shirowzhan, Gelareh Mohammadi
{"title":"Applications of object detection in modular construction based on a comparative evaluation of deep learning algorithms","authors":"Chang Liu, S. Sepasgozar, S. Shirowzhan, Gelareh Mohammadi","doi":"10.1108/CI-02-2020-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe practice of artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being promoted by technology developers. However, its adoption rate is still reported as low in the construction industry due to a lack of expertise and the limited reliable applications for AI technology. Hence, this paper aims to present the detailed outcome of experimentations evaluating the applicability and the performance of AI object detection algorithms for construction modular object detection.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper provides a thorough evaluation of two deep learning algorithms for object detection, including the faster region-based convolutional neural network (faster RCNN) and single shot multi-box detector (SSD). Two types of metrics are also presented; first, the average recall and mean average precision by image pixels; second, the recall and precision by counting. To conduct the experiments using the selected algorithms, four infrastructure and building construction sites are chosen to collect the required data, including a total of 990 images of three different but common modular objects, including modular panels, safety barricades and site fences.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results of the comprehensive evaluation of the algorithms show that the performance of faster RCNN and SSD depends on the context that detection occurs. Indeed, surrounding objects and the backgrounds of the objects affect the level of accuracy obtained from the AI analysis and may particularly effect precision and recall. The analysis of loss lines shows that the loss lines for selected objects depend on both their geometry and the image background. The results on selected objects show that faster RCNN offers higher accuracy than SSD for detection of selected objects.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe results show that modular object detection is crucial in construction for the achievement of the required information for project quality and safety objectives. The detection process can significantly improve monitoring object installation progress in an accurate and machine-based manner avoiding human errors. The results of this paper are limited to three construction sites, but future investigations can cover more tasks or objects from different construction sites in a fully automated manner.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper’s originality lies in offering new AI applications in modular construction, using a large first-hand data set collected from three construction sites. Furthermore, the paper presents the scientific evaluation results of implementing recent object detection algorithms across a set of extended metrics using the original training and validation data sets to improve the generalisability of the experimentation. This paper also provides the practitioners and scholars with a workflow on AI applications in the modular context and the first-hand referencing data.\n","PeriodicalId":221945,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-02-2020-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Purpose The practice of artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being promoted by technology developers. However, its adoption rate is still reported as low in the construction industry due to a lack of expertise and the limited reliable applications for AI technology. Hence, this paper aims to present the detailed outcome of experimentations evaluating the applicability and the performance of AI object detection algorithms for construction modular object detection. Design/methodology/approach This paper provides a thorough evaluation of two deep learning algorithms for object detection, including the faster region-based convolutional neural network (faster RCNN) and single shot multi-box detector (SSD). Two types of metrics are also presented; first, the average recall and mean average precision by image pixels; second, the recall and precision by counting. To conduct the experiments using the selected algorithms, four infrastructure and building construction sites are chosen to collect the required data, including a total of 990 images of three different but common modular objects, including modular panels, safety barricades and site fences. Findings The results of the comprehensive evaluation of the algorithms show that the performance of faster RCNN and SSD depends on the context that detection occurs. Indeed, surrounding objects and the backgrounds of the objects affect the level of accuracy obtained from the AI analysis and may particularly effect precision and recall. The analysis of loss lines shows that the loss lines for selected objects depend on both their geometry and the image background. The results on selected objects show that faster RCNN offers higher accuracy than SSD for detection of selected objects. Research limitations/implications The results show that modular object detection is crucial in construction for the achievement of the required information for project quality and safety objectives. The detection process can significantly improve monitoring object installation progress in an accurate and machine-based manner avoiding human errors. The results of this paper are limited to three construction sites, but future investigations can cover more tasks or objects from different construction sites in a fully automated manner. Originality/value This paper’s originality lies in offering new AI applications in modular construction, using a large first-hand data set collected from three construction sites. Furthermore, the paper presents the scientific evaluation results of implementing recent object detection algorithms across a set of extended metrics using the original training and validation data sets to improve the generalisability of the experimentation. This paper also provides the practitioners and scholars with a workflow on AI applications in the modular context and the first-hand referencing data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于深度学习算法比较评价的模块化建筑中目标检测的应用
人工智能(AI)的实践越来越受到技术开发人员的推动。然而,由于缺乏专业知识和人工智能技术的可靠应用有限,其在建筑行业的采用率仍然很低。因此,本文旨在提供详细的实验结果,评估人工智能目标检测算法在建筑模块化目标检测中的适用性和性能。本文对两种用于目标检测的深度学习算法进行了全面的评估,包括更快的基于区域的卷积神经网络(faster RCNN)和单镜头多盒检测器(SSD)。本文还介绍了两种度量标准;首先,按图像像素计算平均查全率和平均查准率;二是通过计数提高查全率和查准率。为了使用所选择的算法进行实验,我们选择了四个基础设施和建筑施工现场来收集所需的数据,其中包括三种不同但常见的模块化物体的990张图像,包括模块化面板、安全路障和现场围栏。对算法的综合评估结果表明,更快的RCNN和SSD的性能取决于检测发生的上下文。事实上,周围的物体和物体的背景会影响从人工智能分析中获得的准确性水平,尤其可能影响精度和召回率。对损失线的分析表明,所选物体的损失线取决于其几何形状和图像背景。在选定对象上的结果表明,更快的RCNN对选定对象的检测精度高于SSD。研究局限/启示研究结果表明,模块化目标检测对于实现工程质量和安全目标所需的信息至关重要。该检测过程可以以精确和基于机器的方式显著提高监控对象的安装进度,避免人为错误。本文的结果仅限于三个建筑工地,但未来的调查可以覆盖更多的任务或对象,从不同的建筑工地在一个完全自动化的方式。原创性/价值本文的原创性在于使用从三个建筑工地收集的大量第一手数据集,在模块化建筑中提供了新的人工智能应用。此外,本文还介绍了使用原始训练和验证数据集在一组扩展度量中实现最新目标检测算法的科学评估结果,以提高实验的通用性。本文还为从业者和学者提供了模块化环境下人工智能应用的工作流程和第一手参考数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The feasibility of transparent solar panels for high-rise building façade in Sri Lanka Detecting skewed pricing in tenders for public-sector projects Understanding the key risks in circular construction projects: from systematic review to conceptual framework A critical review of quantity surveying education in an offsite construction perspective: strategies for up-skilling Development and testing of lean simulation game on set-based design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1