A critical review of quantity surveying education in an offsite construction perspective: strategies for up-skilling

Buddhini Ginigaddara, Thayaparan Gajendran, Cameron Beard
{"title":"A critical review of quantity surveying education in an offsite construction perspective: strategies for up-skilling","authors":"Buddhini Ginigaddara, Thayaparan Gajendran, Cameron Beard","doi":"10.1108/ci-12-2022-0322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Offsite construction (OSC) is a modern method of construction (MMC) that involves manufacturing and assembly of buildings. Industry 4.0-driven technological advancements have accelerated OSC uptake causing many skilled construction workers requiring re-skilling or up-skilling. Quantity surveyors currently play an important role throughout a construction project life cycle, and hence, their knowledge on OSC projects is vital for the continuity of quantity surveying (QS) profession. The purpose of this paper is to critically review QS education in an OSC perspective and to propose strategies for up-skilling. Design/methodology/approach This research includes a detailed literature review of QS and OSC to evaluate how OSC affects the QS profession. Publicly available information on the university websites on accredited QS and construction management degrees was reviewed to identify OSC and MMC references, specifically the content listing and learning outcomes. Findings Out of the 315 degrees offered by 157 universities, only 69 degrees in 32 universities refer to OSC or MMC. OSC concept is explicitly referred in subjects related to construction technology, production management, lean construction, digital construction and MMC. As such, the research suggests including lean production principles, OSC techniques and design philosophies such as design for manufacture and assembly be added to the QS curricula. Research limitations/implications This research is a comprehensive desktop study that does not involve empirical data-based evaluation. Research findings inform strategies to improve QS education and professional competencies. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first of its kind that evaluates accredited QS degrees and learning requirements in an OSC perspective.","PeriodicalId":221945,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","volume":"7 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-12-2022-0322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Offsite construction (OSC) is a modern method of construction (MMC) that involves manufacturing and assembly of buildings. Industry 4.0-driven technological advancements have accelerated OSC uptake causing many skilled construction workers requiring re-skilling or up-skilling. Quantity surveyors currently play an important role throughout a construction project life cycle, and hence, their knowledge on OSC projects is vital for the continuity of quantity surveying (QS) profession. The purpose of this paper is to critically review QS education in an OSC perspective and to propose strategies for up-skilling. Design/methodology/approach This research includes a detailed literature review of QS and OSC to evaluate how OSC affects the QS profession. Publicly available information on the university websites on accredited QS and construction management degrees was reviewed to identify OSC and MMC references, specifically the content listing and learning outcomes. Findings Out of the 315 degrees offered by 157 universities, only 69 degrees in 32 universities refer to OSC or MMC. OSC concept is explicitly referred in subjects related to construction technology, production management, lean construction, digital construction and MMC. As such, the research suggests including lean production principles, OSC techniques and design philosophies such as design for manufacture and assembly be added to the QS curricula. Research limitations/implications This research is a comprehensive desktop study that does not involve empirical data-based evaluation. Research findings inform strategies to improve QS education and professional competencies. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first of its kind that evaluates accredited QS degrees and learning requirements in an OSC perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非现场施工视角下的工料测量教育:提升技能的策略
非现场施工(OSC)是一种涉及建筑物制造和组装的现代施工方法。工业4.0驱动的技术进步加速了OSC的吸收,导致许多熟练的建筑工人需要重新培训或提高技能。工料测量师目前在整个建设项目生命周期中发挥着重要作用,因此,他们对OSC项目的了解对于工料测量(QS)专业的连续性至关重要。本文的目的是在OSC的视角下批判性地回顾QS教育,并提出提高技能的策略。本研究包括对QS和OSC的详细文献综述,以评估OSC如何影响QS职业。对大学网站上关于QS和建筑管理学位认证的公开信息进行了审查,以确定OSC和MMC的参考资料,特别是内容列表和学习成果。在157所大学提供的315个学位中,只有32所大学的69个学位涉及OSC或MMC。在施工技术、生产管理、精益施工、数字化施工、MMC等相关学科中都明确提到了OSC的概念。因此,研究建议将精益生产原则、OSC技术和设计哲学(如制造和装配设计)添加到QS课程中。本研究是一项综合性的桌面研究,不涉及基于经验数据的评估。研究结果为提高QS教育和专业能力的策略提供信息。据作者所知,本文是第一篇从OSC的角度评估QS认证学位和学习要求的论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The feasibility of transparent solar panels for high-rise building façade in Sri Lanka Detecting skewed pricing in tenders for public-sector projects Understanding the key risks in circular construction projects: from systematic review to conceptual framework A critical review of quantity surveying education in an offsite construction perspective: strategies for up-skilling Development and testing of lean simulation game on set-based design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1