Habitat Selection by Two Species of Cleaner Fishes That May be Beneficial in Removing Sea Lice From Cultured Salmon

Kaitlyn Julianna Charmley
{"title":"Habitat Selection by Two Species of Cleaner Fishes That May be Beneficial in Removing Sea Lice From Cultured Salmon","authors":"Kaitlyn Julianna Charmley","doi":"10.21083/surg.v11i0.4656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sea lice are detrimental ectoparasites that attach to Atlantic salmon causing physiological damage and costing farmers millions in inventory loss and treatments. Cleaner fishes have been introduced into sea cages to act as a biological control of sea lice which is likely a solution for Canadian salmon aquaculture industries. To improve cleaner fish foraging efficiency, this study seeks to determine the optimal habitat for cleaner fishes in Canadian aquaculture. I hypothesized that to be effective cleaner fishes, both the cunners and the lumpfish require habitats that provide them with shelter and places for rest because neither species live solely in the water column. My second hypothesis was that the cunners and the lumpfish require different habitats due to their different morphologies. Habitat comparisons were conducted with three habitats and a control in each individual fishes tank for a total of 8 cunners and 25 lumpfish. It was determined that only cunners required shelter, possibly due to the lumpfish’s ability to adhere to the glass tank walls for rest. Moreover, there was no significant difference in habitat preference between the two species. However, the lumpfish were less preferential between habitat and preferred three of the four habitats equally. It should be noted that the lumpfish and the cunners utilized the same habitats in separate ways to better fit their species-specific requirements; so future research on the co-existence of the two species could lead to increased foraging efficiency through two-species cleaner fish systems.","PeriodicalId":292569,"journal":{"name":"SURG Journal","volume":"411 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SURG Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21083/surg.v11i0.4656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sea lice are detrimental ectoparasites that attach to Atlantic salmon causing physiological damage and costing farmers millions in inventory loss and treatments. Cleaner fishes have been introduced into sea cages to act as a biological control of sea lice which is likely a solution for Canadian salmon aquaculture industries. To improve cleaner fish foraging efficiency, this study seeks to determine the optimal habitat for cleaner fishes in Canadian aquaculture. I hypothesized that to be effective cleaner fishes, both the cunners and the lumpfish require habitats that provide them with shelter and places for rest because neither species live solely in the water column. My second hypothesis was that the cunners and the lumpfish require different habitats due to their different morphologies. Habitat comparisons were conducted with three habitats and a control in each individual fishes tank for a total of 8 cunners and 25 lumpfish. It was determined that only cunners required shelter, possibly due to the lumpfish’s ability to adhere to the glass tank walls for rest. Moreover, there was no significant difference in habitat preference between the two species. However, the lumpfish were less preferential between habitat and preferred three of the four habitats equally. It should be noted that the lumpfish and the cunners utilized the same habitats in separate ways to better fit their species-specific requirements; so future research on the co-existence of the two species could lead to increased foraging efficiency through two-species cleaner fish systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种清洁鱼的栖息地选择可能有助于去除养殖鲑鱼的海虱
海虱是附着在大西洋鲑鱼身上的有害体外寄生虫,会造成生理损害,并给养殖者造成数百万美元的库存损失和治疗费用。清洁鱼被引入海笼,作为对海虱的生物控制,这可能是加拿大鲑鱼养殖业的解决方案。为了提高清洁鱼的觅食效率,本研究旨在确定加拿大水产养殖中清洁鱼的最佳栖息地。我假设,为了成为有效的清洁鱼,孔雀鱼和圆头鱼都需要栖息地,为它们提供庇护和休息的地方,因为这两种鱼都不完全生活在水中。我的第二个假设是,由于形态不同,孔雀鱼和圆头鱼需要不同的栖息地。在每个单独的鱼缸中,对8条康纳鱼和25条块状鱼进行了3个生境和一个对照的生境比较。人们确定只有鱼才需要庇护,可能是因为肿块鱼能够附着在玻璃水箱壁上休息。此外,两种植物的生境偏好无显著差异。然而,肿块鱼对栖息地的偏好程度较低,对四种栖息地中的三种都有同样的偏好。应当指出的是,圆头鱼和梭子鱼以不同的方式利用相同的生境,以便更好地满足其物种特有的需要;因此,未来对两种鱼类共存的研究可能会通过两种清洁鱼系统提高觅食效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Supporting Dietitians in Practice: Professional Development Activities of Dietitians of Canada in the Past 30 Years Canada's Foreign Direct Investment Dependency Problem Predicting The Great Lakes Wetlands' Resilience to Climate Change in Response to Phragmites australis subsp. australis Removal Size Differences in Personality Profiles of the Cunner Wrasse (Tautogolabrus adspersus) Bava & Leone: The “Spaghettification” of the American Cinematic Form
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1