The mediating role of Motivation to learn in the Training needs analysis and Training reaction relationship

D. Basnet, D. Gautam
{"title":"The mediating role of Motivation to learn in the Training needs analysis and Training reaction relationship","authors":"D. Basnet, D. Gautam","doi":"10.3126/irjms.v7i1.50609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Propose – Most of the training evaluations are based on trainees’ reaction but rare research has been done on training reaction as a training outcome. In addition, Insurance companies’ employees have also shared the similar anecdotes. Based on the evidence and phenomenology, the aim of this study is to examine the training reaction via. training needs analysis and motivation to learn. \nDesign/ Methodology/ Approach - The philosophical perspective of this study are single reality (ontology) and positivist epistemology. Descriptive research design was used to know the current status and casual research design was used for examining the impact among exogenous, intervening and endogenous constructs. In this study, reliability, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were checked by using 203 questionnaires and confirmed for acceptable reliability, validity and model fit of the constructs. For robust analysis, structural equation modeling was employed and to validate the finding, PROCESS macro and Sobel test were employed and found the similar results. \nFinding - The study found positive relationship among training needs analysis and motivation to learn; motivation to learn and training reaction; and training needs analysis and training reaction. Moreover, the study confirmed that motivation to learn mediates the relationship between training needs analysis and training reaction which concludes that the positive training reaction and motivation to learn are the expected outcomes from well-designed training program. \nPractical Implication – Practicle implication for insurance companies have been presented in this study, thereby the insurance companies could increase the performance and the motivation level of employees. \nOriginal Value – This research paper validate the proposed training needs analysis, motivation to learn, and training reaction construct that provide the empirical evidence for building a strong theory.","PeriodicalId":319730,"journal":{"name":"The International Research Journal of Management Science","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Research Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/irjms.v7i1.50609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Propose – Most of the training evaluations are based on trainees’ reaction but rare research has been done on training reaction as a training outcome. In addition, Insurance companies’ employees have also shared the similar anecdotes. Based on the evidence and phenomenology, the aim of this study is to examine the training reaction via. training needs analysis and motivation to learn. Design/ Methodology/ Approach - The philosophical perspective of this study are single reality (ontology) and positivist epistemology. Descriptive research design was used to know the current status and casual research design was used for examining the impact among exogenous, intervening and endogenous constructs. In this study, reliability, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were checked by using 203 questionnaires and confirmed for acceptable reliability, validity and model fit of the constructs. For robust analysis, structural equation modeling was employed and to validate the finding, PROCESS macro and Sobel test were employed and found the similar results. Finding - The study found positive relationship among training needs analysis and motivation to learn; motivation to learn and training reaction; and training needs analysis and training reaction. Moreover, the study confirmed that motivation to learn mediates the relationship between training needs analysis and training reaction which concludes that the positive training reaction and motivation to learn are the expected outcomes from well-designed training program. Practical Implication – Practicle implication for insurance companies have been presented in this study, thereby the insurance companies could increase the performance and the motivation level of employees. Original Value – This research paper validate the proposed training needs analysis, motivation to learn, and training reaction construct that provide the empirical evidence for building a strong theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习动机在培训需求分析与培训反应关系中的中介作用
建议-大多数培训评估都是基于学员的反应,但很少有研究将培训反应作为培训结果。此外,保险公司的员工也分享了类似的轶事。本研究以证据学和现象学为基础,对训练反应进行了实证研究。培训需求分析和学习动机。设计/方法论/方法-本研究的哲学观点是单一现实(本体论)和实证认识论。描述性研究设计用于了解现状,随机研究设计用于检验外生、干预和内生构念之间的影响。本研究使用203份问卷进行信度、探索性和验证性因子分析,确认构念的信度、效度和模型拟合均可接受。为了进行稳健分析,采用了结构方程模型,为了验证这一发现,采用了PROCESS宏和Sobel检验,结果相似。研究发现:培训需求分析与学习动机呈正相关;学习动机和训练反应;以及培训需求分析和培训反应。此外,研究还证实了学习动机在训练需求分析和训练反应之间的中介关系,从而得出积极的训练反应和学习动机是设计良好的训练计划的预期结果。实践启示-本研究对保险公司提出了实践启示,从而保险公司可以提高员工的绩效和激励水平。原始价值——本文验证了提出的培训需求分析、学习动机和培训反应结构,为建立强有力的理论提供了经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on Demographics Characteristics on Purchase Intention of Smartphone The mediating role of Motivation to learn in the Training needs analysis and Training reaction relationship The covid-19 pandemic caused vulnerability and survival strategies of star hotels in Nepal Macro-economic variables and financing decisions of Nepalese non-financial firms Psychological Workplace Climate, Emotional Intelligence and Employee Well-Being in Nepali Information Technology Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1