{"title":"Film (Co)Production in Latin America and European Festivals","authors":"M. Campos","doi":"10.14361/zkmm-2015-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the late 1980s, the Rotterdam International Film Festival launched the Hubert Bals Fund with the intention of supporting films shot in pe ripheral regions. During these two decades many other festivals have created similar programs and film producers are increasingly using these funding mechanisms to finish their films and, at the same time, achieve exposure on the circuit. In the case of Latin America, which is one of the so-called ‘periph eral regions’, the Uruguayan production company Control Z Films and the Chilean Fábula are clear examples in this funding circuit that are becoming ‘less and less alternative’. Almost all these companies’ films have received some financial aid from this kind of initiatives. Some of the programs of most relevance in the international context, the ones created around European festivals, are the above mentioned Hubert Bals Fund and the World Cinema Fund launched by the Berlin Inter national Film Festival in 2004. Cine en Construcción, crucial for the cinema in Latin America since its inception in 2002, is a joint initiative between the San Sebastián International Film Festival and the Recon tres Cinémas d’Amérique Latine de Toulouse that exhibits selected film projects in film sessions for film professionals. One of the key aims of these film funding models is related to an interest held by some festivals in producing in regions they consider to be peripheral. Despite the fact that cinemas from Africa, Asia or Latin America are still considered to be peripheral, they have been continually present in festivals all over the world for decades (ELENA 1999). These funding programs show the way in which film festivals still consider some areas as peripheral. The same happens if we look at the themed festivals or sidebars organized around any of these peripheral regions.","PeriodicalId":414783,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Kulturmanagement","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Kulturmanagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/zkmm-2015-0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
In the late 1980s, the Rotterdam International Film Festival launched the Hubert Bals Fund with the intention of supporting films shot in pe ripheral regions. During these two decades many other festivals have created similar programs and film producers are increasingly using these funding mechanisms to finish their films and, at the same time, achieve exposure on the circuit. In the case of Latin America, which is one of the so-called ‘periph eral regions’, the Uruguayan production company Control Z Films and the Chilean Fábula are clear examples in this funding circuit that are becoming ‘less and less alternative’. Almost all these companies’ films have received some financial aid from this kind of initiatives. Some of the programs of most relevance in the international context, the ones created around European festivals, are the above mentioned Hubert Bals Fund and the World Cinema Fund launched by the Berlin Inter national Film Festival in 2004. Cine en Construcción, crucial for the cinema in Latin America since its inception in 2002, is a joint initiative between the San Sebastián International Film Festival and the Recon tres Cinémas d’Amérique Latine de Toulouse that exhibits selected film projects in film sessions for film professionals. One of the key aims of these film funding models is related to an interest held by some festivals in producing in regions they consider to be peripheral. Despite the fact that cinemas from Africa, Asia or Latin America are still considered to be peripheral, they have been continually present in festivals all over the world for decades (ELENA 1999). These funding programs show the way in which film festivals still consider some areas as peripheral. The same happens if we look at the themed festivals or sidebars organized around any of these peripheral regions.
20世纪80年代末,鹿特丹国际电影节发起了休伯特·巴尔斯基金,旨在支持在周边地区拍摄的电影。在这二十年里,许多其他电影节也创建了类似的项目,电影制片人越来越多地利用这些资助机制来完成他们的电影,同时在巡回演出中获得曝光。拉丁美洲是所谓的“边缘地区”之一,乌拉圭制作公司Control Z Films和智利Fábula是这一融资循环中“越来越少选择”的明显例子。几乎所有这些公司的电影都从这种倡议中获得了一些经济援助。在国际背景下,一些与欧洲电影节最相关的项目是上文提到的休伯特·巴尔斯基金和2004年柏林国际电影节发起的世界电影基金。Cine en Construcción自2002年成立以来,对拉丁美洲的电影至关重要,是San Sebastián国际电影节和图卢兹拉丁电影协会的联合倡议,在电影会议中为电影专业人士展示精选的电影项目。这些电影投资模式的主要目的之一与一些电影节对在他们认为是边缘地区制作电影的兴趣有关。尽管非洲、亚洲或拉丁美洲的电影院仍然被认为是边缘,但几十年来,它们一直在世界各地的电影节上不断出现(ELENA 1999)。这些资助项目表明,电影节仍将一些领域视为边缘。如果我们看看围绕这些外围区域组织的主题节日或侧边栏,情况也是如此。