International Comparison on Obstacles to Service Conversion of Manufacturing Industries

Keiko Toya
{"title":"International Comparison on Obstacles to Service Conversion of Manufacturing Industries","authors":"Keiko Toya","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is an international comparison of Japan and Scandinavia regarding necessary conditions in manufacturing industries that are undergoing servitization.With the shift of developed economies to services, there has been a noticeable trend toward the shift of manufacturing industries to services. However, Japanese manufacturing industries lack service personnel in all aspects, including service planning, management, and front-line operations, because their operations differ from those of traditional manufacturing industries. The shortage of human resources is a phenomenon, and it is necessary to address the structural issues that prevent the development of human resources. Toya (2016, 2020, 2022) identified the obstacles to Servitization in the Japanese manufacturing industry as: a seed-oriented organizational culture, lack of medium- and long-term evaluation of business and human resources, low mobility of human resources, and, by extension, a lack of the industry structure, and attitudes toward the way they work. At the same time, we have conducted structural and time-series analyses based on large-scale fixed-point survey data on the status of servicization. An international comparison focusing on the unique manufacturing culture of the Japanese manufacturing industry and institutional issues related to human resource development and mobility, as revealed by these previous studies, was necessary.This study quantitatively compares Japan and the Nordic countries in terms of the elements and structures that impede the shift to manufacturing services. Specifically, a survey will be conducted simultaneously with manufacturing management in four Nordic countries (Sweden, Finland, Norway, and Denmark) and Japan for comparative analysis. The survey is currently underway and the results and discussion will be presented at a later date.","PeriodicalId":363648,"journal":{"name":"Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is an international comparison of Japan and Scandinavia regarding necessary conditions in manufacturing industries that are undergoing servitization.With the shift of developed economies to services, there has been a noticeable trend toward the shift of manufacturing industries to services. However, Japanese manufacturing industries lack service personnel in all aspects, including service planning, management, and front-line operations, because their operations differ from those of traditional manufacturing industries. The shortage of human resources is a phenomenon, and it is necessary to address the structural issues that prevent the development of human resources. Toya (2016, 2020, 2022) identified the obstacles to Servitization in the Japanese manufacturing industry as: a seed-oriented organizational culture, lack of medium- and long-term evaluation of business and human resources, low mobility of human resources, and, by extension, a lack of the industry structure, and attitudes toward the way they work. At the same time, we have conducted structural and time-series analyses based on large-scale fixed-point survey data on the status of servicization. An international comparison focusing on the unique manufacturing culture of the Japanese manufacturing industry and institutional issues related to human resource development and mobility, as revealed by these previous studies, was necessary.This study quantitatively compares Japan and the Nordic countries in terms of the elements and structures that impede the shift to manufacturing services. Specifically, a survey will be conducted simultaneously with manufacturing management in four Nordic countries (Sweden, Finland, Norway, and Denmark) and Japan for comparative analysis. The survey is currently underway and the results and discussion will be presented at a later date.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制造业服务业转型障碍的国际比较
本研究是对日本和斯堪的纳维亚的制造业服务化的必要条件进行国际比较。随着发达经济体向服务业转移,制造业向服务业转移的趋势也很明显。然而,日本制造业与传统制造业不同,在服务规划、管理、一线运营等各方面都缺乏服务人员。人力资源短缺是一种现象,有必要解决阻碍人力资源开发的结构性问题。Toya(2016, 2020, 2022)认为日本制造业服务化的障碍是:以种子为导向的组织文化,缺乏对业务和人力资源的中长期评估,人力资源的低流动性,以及,推而广之,缺乏行业结构和对他们工作方式的态度。同时,基于大规模定点调查数据,对服务化状况进行了结构分析和时间序列分析。有必要对日本制造业独特的制造文化以及与人力资源开发和流动性相关的制度问题进行国际比较。本研究就阻碍日本和北欧国家向制造业服务业转变的要素和结构进行了定量比较。具体而言,将与北欧四国(瑞典、芬兰、挪威、丹麦)和日本的制造业管理同时进行调查,以进行比较分析。调查目前正在进行中,结果和讨论将在晚些时候公布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Singapore’s Manufacturing Small and Medium Size Enterprises Embrace Industry 4.0 Key Competencies for Circular Manufacturing Communication components for Human Intention Prediction – A Survey Where are we at? A review of the advances in the ethical aspects of human-robot collaboration International Comparison on Obstacles to Service Conversion of Manufacturing Industries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1