How to Answer Comparison Questions

Hongxuan Tang, Yu Hong, Xin Chen, Kaili Wu, Min Zhang
{"title":"How to Answer Comparison Questions","authors":"Hongxuan Tang, Yu Hong, Xin Chen, Kaili Wu, Min Zhang","doi":"10.1109/IALP48816.2019.9037729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Which city has the larger population, Tokyo or New York?”. To answer the question, in general, we necessarily obtain the prior knowledge about the populations of both cities, and accordingly determine the answer by numeric comparison. Using Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) to answer such a question has become a popular research topic, which is referred to as a task of Comparison Question Answering (CQA). In this paper, we propose a novel neural CQA model which is trained to answer comparison question. The model is designed as a sophisticated neural network which performs inference in a step-by-step pipeline, including the steps of attentive entity detection (e.g., “city”), alignment of comparable attributes (e.g., “population” of the target “cities”), contrast calculation (larger or smaller), as well as binary classification of positive and negative answers. The experimentation on HotpotQA illustrates that the proposed method achieves an average F1 score of 63.09%, outperforming the baseline with about 10% F1 scores. In addition, it performs better than a series of competitive models, including DecompRC, BERT.","PeriodicalId":208066,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP)","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IALP48816.2019.9037729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

“Which city has the larger population, Tokyo or New York?”. To answer the question, in general, we necessarily obtain the prior knowledge about the populations of both cities, and accordingly determine the answer by numeric comparison. Using Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) to answer such a question has become a popular research topic, which is referred to as a task of Comparison Question Answering (CQA). In this paper, we propose a novel neural CQA model which is trained to answer comparison question. The model is designed as a sophisticated neural network which performs inference in a step-by-step pipeline, including the steps of attentive entity detection (e.g., “city”), alignment of comparable attributes (e.g., “population” of the target “cities”), contrast calculation (larger or smaller), as well as binary classification of positive and negative answers. The experimentation on HotpotQA illustrates that the proposed method achieves an average F1 score of 63.09%, outperforming the baseline with about 10% F1 scores. In addition, it performs better than a series of competitive models, including DecompRC, BERT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何回答比较问题
“东京和纽约,哪个城市人口更多?”一般来说,为了回答这个问题,我们必须获得关于两个城市人口的先验知识,并相应地通过数字比较确定答案。使用机器阅读理解(MRC)来回答这样的问题已经成为一个热门的研究课题,这被称为比较问答任务(CQA)。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的神经CQA模型,该模型被训练来回答比较问题。该模型被设计为一个复杂的神经网络,它在一步一步的管道中执行推理,包括注意实体检测(例如,“城市”),可比较属性的校准(例如,目标“城市”的“人口”),对比计算(较大或较小),以及积极和消极答案的二进制分类。在HotpotQA上的实验表明,该方法的平均F1分数为63.09%,比基线的F1分数高出约10%。此外,它的性能优于一系列竞争模型,包括DecompRC, BERT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A General Procedure for Improving Language Models in Low-Resource Speech Recognition Automated Prediction of Item Difficulty in Reading Comprehension Using Long Short-Term Memory An Measurement Method of Ancient Poetry Difficulty for Adaptive Testing How to Answer Comparison Questions An Enhancement of Malay Social Media Text Normalization for Lexicon-Based Sentiment Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1