The Models of Mandates of the Parliamentarians in Belarus and in the EU: Comparative Legal Aspect

A. Chmyha
{"title":"The Models of Mandates of the Parliamentarians in Belarus and in the EU: Comparative Legal Aspect","authors":"A. Chmyha","doi":"10.15290/sup.2019.03.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‣ Goal – to analyze and compare the key points of concepts of representative mandates in Belarus and in the EU. ‣ Research methodology – the basis of the work is the comparative -legal method of research, as well as other methods of scientific knowledge. ‣ Score/results – in European legal science, there is a traditional division of the parliamentarian’s representative mandate into two types that currently prevail: a free and imperative mandate. The type of a mandate determines the character of cooperation of an elected representative with his electorate A number of progressive characteristics of the mixed type of parliamentarian’s mandate are stated. ‣ Originality/value – it is concluded that the gradual transition to the normative regulation and promotion of the mixed (hybrid) type of parliamentarian’s mandate in Republic of Belarus is preferable. |","PeriodicalId":158947,"journal":{"name":"Studia Sieci Uniwersytetów Pogranicza","volume":"255 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Sieci Uniwersytetów Pogranicza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/sup.2019.03.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‣ Goal – to analyze and compare the key points of concepts of representative mandates in Belarus and in the EU. ‣ Research methodology – the basis of the work is the comparative -legal method of research, as well as other methods of scientific knowledge. ‣ Score/results – in European legal science, there is a traditional division of the parliamentarian’s representative mandate into two types that currently prevail: a free and imperative mandate. The type of a mandate determines the character of cooperation of an elected representative with his electorate A number of progressive characteristics of the mixed type of parliamentarian’s mandate are stated. ‣ Originality/value – it is concluded that the gradual transition to the normative regulation and promotion of the mixed (hybrid) type of parliamentarian’s mandate in Republic of Belarus is preferable. |
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白俄罗斯和欧盟议员授权模式:比较法律方面
目标-分析和比较白俄罗斯和欧盟代议制授权概念的要点。研究方法论——工作的基础是比较法研究方法,以及其他科学知识方法。分数/结果——在欧洲法律科学中,传统上把议员的代表授权分为两种类型,目前流行的是自由授权和强制授权。授权的类型决定了当选代表与其选民合作的性质。本文阐述了混合型议员授权的若干进步特征。独创性/价值-结论是逐渐过渡到规范的规定和促进混合(混合)类型的国会议员的任务在白俄罗斯共和国是可取的。|
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Модели и правовое регулирование здравоохранения в Польше и Италии Проблемы правового регулирования административных услуг в Украине The Experience Economy: Perspectives for East European Borderlands Risk of Global Economic Crisis in 2022 and the Mechanism of Transmission of Economic Shocks between the Main Areas of the Global Economy The Models of Mandates of the Parliamentarians in Belarus and in the EU: Comparative Legal Aspect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1