person or the issue? Relational process, person- and idea- targeted questions in UK and Ghanaian parliamentary questions

Kwabena Sarfo Sarfo-Kantankah
{"title":"person or the issue? Relational process, person- and idea- targeted questions in UK and Ghanaian parliamentary questions","authors":"Kwabena Sarfo Sarfo-Kantankah","doi":"10.47963/joss.v10i1.906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using parliamentary questions as data and a corpus-assisted systemic functional approach through Wordsmith Tools, this paper, with specific reference to relational processes, explores yes/no interrogatives in order to establish how MPs encode in their questions issues of attitudes, commitments, personalities and ideas of (Prime) Ministers during Ghanaian Minister’s and UK Prime Minister’s Questions. The paper finds that MPs use yes/no interrogatives with relational processes to describe (Prime) Ministers as carriers of certain attributes relating to their positions and responsibilities, while some of the questions are issue- focused. To achieve this, MPs employ two main questioning strategies: person-targeted and idea-targeted pragmatic strategies, thereby raising issues of (Prime) Ministers’ credibility and commitment to duty. The paper has implications for parliamentary questions, party politics and MPs’ and (Prime) Ministers’ duties as representatives of their constituents.","PeriodicalId":433603,"journal":{"name":"Oguaa Journal of Social Sciences","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oguaa Journal of Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47963/joss.v10i1.906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using parliamentary questions as data and a corpus-assisted systemic functional approach through Wordsmith Tools, this paper, with specific reference to relational processes, explores yes/no interrogatives in order to establish how MPs encode in their questions issues of attitudes, commitments, personalities and ideas of (Prime) Ministers during Ghanaian Minister’s and UK Prime Minister’s Questions. The paper finds that MPs use yes/no interrogatives with relational processes to describe (Prime) Ministers as carriers of certain attributes relating to their positions and responsibilities, while some of the questions are issue- focused. To achieve this, MPs employ two main questioning strategies: person-targeted and idea-targeted pragmatic strategies, thereby raising issues of (Prime) Ministers’ credibility and commitment to duty. The paper has implications for parliamentary questions, party politics and MPs’ and (Prime) Ministers’ duties as representatives of their constituents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人还是问题?英国和加纳议会问题中的关系过程、个人和想法为目标的问题
本文通过Wordsmith工具使用议会问题作为数据和语料库辅助的系统功能方法,特别参考关系过程,探索是/否疑问句,以确定议员如何在他们的问题中编码加纳部长和英国首相的态度、承诺、个性和想法等问题。本文发现,国会议员使用带有关系过程的是/否疑问句来描述(首相)作为与其职位和责任相关的某些属性的载体,而一些问题是聚焦于问题的。为了实现这一目标,议员们采用了两种主要的质疑策略:以人为目标和以理念为目标的务实策略,从而提出了(总理)的可信度和对职责的承诺的问题。这篇论文对议会问题、政党政治以及议员和(首相)作为其选民代表的职责都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
person or the issue? Relational process, person- and idea- targeted questions in UK and Ghanaian parliamentary questions Civil society organisations, conflict prevention and peacebuilding in Northern Ghana Community participation and sustainable forest management in the Twifo-Hemang-Lower Denkyira District Unpacking Africa as a dynamic continent: Insights from contemporary development issues in Ghana Social capital: The missing link in Ghana’s development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1