{"title":"Calvinist Debates on History","authors":"Costas Gaganakis","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198728818.013.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the mid-sixteenth century, the emergent Calvinist movement was actively engaged in the massive ‘turn to history’ generated by both confessional camps of the Reformation crisis, in their doctrinal and subsequently military and political confrontation that escalated into religious war. Following the lead of their Lutheran counterparts, Calvinist historians ascribed the confrontation in the broader, providential plan, while at the same time attempting to incorporate the national histories of their countries in the narrative of the opposition against Roman theological and political tyranny. Despite Calvin’s original distancing from the prophetic/apocalyptic discourse dominant in the Lutheran camp, the cataclysmic events ushered in by the escalation of the Reformation crisis, especially in France, generated a return to the prophetic/apocalyptic discourse of ecclesiastical history, historia sacra. With the sole exception of Lancelot Voisin de la Popelinière, Calvinist historians in the late sixteenth century sought consolation and encouragement in the providential history of the true, universal Church.","PeriodicalId":296358,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Calvin and Calvinism","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Calvin and Calvinism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198728818.013.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
From the mid-sixteenth century, the emergent Calvinist movement was actively engaged in the massive ‘turn to history’ generated by both confessional camps of the Reformation crisis, in their doctrinal and subsequently military and political confrontation that escalated into religious war. Following the lead of their Lutheran counterparts, Calvinist historians ascribed the confrontation in the broader, providential plan, while at the same time attempting to incorporate the national histories of their countries in the narrative of the opposition against Roman theological and political tyranny. Despite Calvin’s original distancing from the prophetic/apocalyptic discourse dominant in the Lutheran camp, the cataclysmic events ushered in by the escalation of the Reformation crisis, especially in France, generated a return to the prophetic/apocalyptic discourse of ecclesiastical history, historia sacra. With the sole exception of Lancelot Voisin de la Popelinière, Calvinist historians in the late sixteenth century sought consolation and encouragement in the providential history of the true, universal Church.
从16世纪中期开始,新兴的加尔文主义运动积极参与了由宗教改革危机的两个忏悔阵营所产生的大规模“转向历史”,在他们的教义和随后的军事和政治对抗中升级为宗教战争。在路德派的领导下,加尔文派的历史学家将这场对抗归因于更广泛的、天意的计划,同时试图将他们国家的民族历史纳入反对罗马神学和政治暴政的叙述中。尽管加尔文最初与在路德派阵营中占主导地位的预言/启示录话语保持距离,但宗教改革危机的升级所带来的灾难性事件,特别是在法国,产生了对教会历史的预言/启示录话语的回归。除了Lancelot Voisin de la popelini之外,16世纪后期的加尔文主义历史学家都在真正的普世教会的天赐历史中寻求安慰和鼓励。