{"title":"Measuring Entrepreneurial Orientation in Developing Economies: Scale Development and Validation","authors":"Asif Ali, Ashok Aima, Jaya Bhasin, R. Hisrich","doi":"10.1177/22786821211045178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) refers to entrepreneurial activities of established and existing firms. It is different from individual entrepreneurial orientation (Popov et al., 2019, Education + Training, vol. 61, pp. 65–78). EO refers to the processes, practices, and decision-making activities that lead to new venture creation (Walter et al., 2006, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 21, pp. 541–567). The EO scale by Lumpkin and Dess (1996, Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, pp. 135–172) consists of innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-taking, competitive aggressiveness, and autonomy. This scale is widely used in literature with major drawback of it being developed and evaluated in a developed economy (the USA) on large corporations. Very little literature is available with reference to validation of EO scales in developing economies, particularly India where firms are generally small. New Comprehensive Entrepreneurial Orientation Scale (CENTORES) has been developed and validated by adding additional dimension of strategic flexibility, which is the novelty of the present study. Data were collected using a survey instrument comprising of 19 items. The scientific scale development procedure as suggested by Schwab, (1980) was followed, first an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was done to explore factors and later confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was done to confirm factors (using SPSS and Amos). Six stable factors emerged from EFA which were subsequently confirmed through CFA. The measurement model confirmed the factors with good model fit indices as suggested by Hair et al. (2014). The model has CMIN/df = 2.237, CFI = 0.917, GFI = 0.928, NFI = 0.882, and RMSEA = 0.052.","PeriodicalId":230921,"journal":{"name":"Jindal Journal of Business Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jindal Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22786821211045178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Entrepreneurial orientation (EO) refers to entrepreneurial activities of established and existing firms. It is different from individual entrepreneurial orientation (Popov et al., 2019, Education + Training, vol. 61, pp. 65–78). EO refers to the processes, practices, and decision-making activities that lead to new venture creation (Walter et al., 2006, Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 21, pp. 541–567). The EO scale by Lumpkin and Dess (1996, Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, pp. 135–172) consists of innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-taking, competitive aggressiveness, and autonomy. This scale is widely used in literature with major drawback of it being developed and evaluated in a developed economy (the USA) on large corporations. Very little literature is available with reference to validation of EO scales in developing economies, particularly India where firms are generally small. New Comprehensive Entrepreneurial Orientation Scale (CENTORES) has been developed and validated by adding additional dimension of strategic flexibility, which is the novelty of the present study. Data were collected using a survey instrument comprising of 19 items. The scientific scale development procedure as suggested by Schwab, (1980) was followed, first an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was done to explore factors and later confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was done to confirm factors (using SPSS and Amos). Six stable factors emerged from EFA which were subsequently confirmed through CFA. The measurement model confirmed the factors with good model fit indices as suggested by Hair et al. (2014). The model has CMIN/df = 2.237, CFI = 0.917, GFI = 0.928, NFI = 0.882, and RMSEA = 0.052.
创业导向(EO)是指既有企业和现有企业的创业活动。它不同于个人创业导向(Popov et al., 2019, Education + Training, vol. 61, pp. 65-78)。EO指的是导致创业的过程、实践和决策活动(Walter et al., 2006, Journal of Business ventures,第21卷,第541-567页)。Lumpkin和Dess (1996, Academy of Management Review,第21卷,第135-172页)的绩效量表包括创新、主动性、冒险、竞争侵略性和自主性。这种量表在文献中被广泛使用,主要缺点是它是在发达经济体(美国)对大公司进行开发和评估的。关于在发展中经济体,特别是公司一般规模较小的印度验证EO规模的文献很少。本文开发了新的综合创业取向量表(CENTORES),并通过增加战略灵活性维度进行了验证,这是本研究的新颖之处。数据收集使用的调查工具包括19个项目。遵循Schwab(1980)提出的科学量表开发程序,首先进行探索性因子分析(EFA)来探索因素,然后进行验证性因子分析(CFA)来确认因素(使用SPSS和Amos)。EFA出现了六个稳定因素,随后通过CFA证实。测量模型确认了Hair et al.(2014)提出的模型拟合指标好的因素。模型的CMIN/df = 2.237, CFI = 0.917, GFI = 0.928, NFI = 0.882, RMSEA = 0.052。