Plurals and Set Theory

Salvatore Florio, Øystein Linnebo
{"title":"Plurals and Set Theory","authors":"Salvatore Florio, Øystein Linnebo","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198791522.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What is the relation between some things and their set? This chapter begins with a formal comparison of plural logic and set theory, which clarifies an important technical aspect of the question. The chapter then turns to more philosophical issues, investigating whether pluralities should be eliminated in favor of sets or vice versa. Both attempted eliminations are rejected in favor of a view, inspired by Cantor, that retains both pluralities and sets, using the former to provide a metaphysical account of the latter.","PeriodicalId":232985,"journal":{"name":"The Many and the One","volume":"332 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Many and the One","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198791522.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What is the relation between some things and their set? This chapter begins with a formal comparison of plural logic and set theory, which clarifies an important technical aspect of the question. The chapter then turns to more philosophical issues, investigating whether pluralities should be eliminated in favor of sets or vice versa. Both attempted eliminations are rejected in favor of a view, inspired by Cantor, that retains both pluralities and sets, using the former to provide a metaphysical account of the latter.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复数和集合论
某些事物与其集合之间的关系是什么?本章以复数逻辑和集合论的形式比较开始,这澄清了这个问题的一个重要的技术方面。然后,这一章转向更哲学的问题,研究是否应该消除多元,以支持集合,反之亦然。这两种尝试的消除都被拒绝了,而支持一种观点,受康托尔的启发,保留了多元和集合,用前者来提供后者的形而上学解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Plurals and Set Theory The Refutation of Singularism? The Semantics of Plurals Critical Plural Logic Plurals and Second-Order Logic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1