Ideological Segregation Among Online Collaborators: Evidence from Wikipedians

S. Greenstein, Grace Gu, Feng Zhu
{"title":"Ideological Segregation Among Online Collaborators: Evidence from Wikipedians","authors":"S. Greenstein, Grace Gu, Feng Zhu","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2851934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do online communities segregate into separate conversations about “contestable knowledge”? We analyze the contributors of biased and slanted content in Wikipedia articles about U.S. politics, and focus on two research questions: (1) Do contributors display tendencies to contribute to topics with similar or opposing bias and slant? (2) Do contributors learn from experience with extreme or neutral content, and does that experience change the slant and bias of their contributions over time? Despite heterogeneity in contributors and their contributions, we find an overall trend towards less segregated conversations. Contributors tend to edit articles with slants that are the opposite of their own views, and the slant from experienced contributors becomes less extreme over time. The experienced contributors with the most extreme biases decline the most. We also find some significant differences between Republicans and Democrats.","PeriodicalId":101668,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Social Inclusion (Including Discrimination Testing) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Social Inclusion (Including Discrimination Testing) (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2851934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Do online communities segregate into separate conversations about “contestable knowledge”? We analyze the contributors of biased and slanted content in Wikipedia articles about U.S. politics, and focus on two research questions: (1) Do contributors display tendencies to contribute to topics with similar or opposing bias and slant? (2) Do contributors learn from experience with extreme or neutral content, and does that experience change the slant and bias of their contributions over time? Despite heterogeneity in contributors and their contributions, we find an overall trend towards less segregated conversations. Contributors tend to edit articles with slants that are the opposite of their own views, and the slant from experienced contributors becomes less extreme over time. The experienced contributors with the most extreme biases decline the most. We also find some significant differences between Republicans and Democrats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线合作者之间的意识形态隔离:来自维基百科的证据
在线社区是否分裂成关于“有争议的知识”的单独对话?我们分析了维基百科关于美国政治的文章中有偏见和倾斜内容的贡献者,并关注两个研究问题:(1)贡献者是否倾向于为具有类似或相反偏见和倾斜的主题做出贡献?(2)贡献者是否从极端或中立内容的经验中学习,这些经验是否会随着时间的推移改变他们贡献的倾向性和偏见?尽管贡献者和他们的贡献存在异质性,但我们发现总体趋势是减少隔离对话。贡献者倾向于用与自己观点相反的观点来编辑文章,而经验丰富的贡献者的观点随着时间的推移变得不那么极端。经验丰富、偏见最极端的贡献者衰退得最多。我们还发现共和党人和民主党人之间存在一些显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Supporting Affordable Housing Supply: Inclusionary Planning in New and Renewing Communities Ideological Segregation Among Online Collaborators: Evidence from Wikipedians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1