The Relationship Between Bob Burnout and Emotional Labor among College Counselors: Mediating Effect of General Self-Efficacy

Yongmei Hou, Jiang Zheng
{"title":"The Relationship Between Bob Burnout and Emotional Labor among College Counselors: Mediating Effect of General Self-Efficacy","authors":"Yongmei Hou, Jiang Zheng","doi":"10.2991/assehr.k.211122.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics of job burnout, general self-efficacy and emotional labor in college counselors, and analyze the relationship among the 3 variables. Totally 538 college counselors were recruited through Internet from 7 universities in Guangdong Province. They were investigated with Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS), Emotional Labor Scale (ELS) and General Self - Efficacy Scale (GSES). The survey results indicate the following four points. First, the scores of MBI-GS, GSES, surface performance, deep performance and natural performance were (2.95±0.85), (2.42±.60), (4.45±.83), (4.27±.94) and (3.81±.85), respectively. Second, counselors with mild, moderate and severe job burnout accounted for 34.4%, 26.8% and 6.3%, respectively. Third, there was a pairwise correlation among the total score of surface performance, GSES and MBI-GS (r = - .104, .247, -.344, all P < 0.01), a pairwise correlation among the total score of deep performance, GSES and MBI-GS (r = .285, -. 235, -. 344, all P < 0.01), as well as a pairwise correlation among the total score of natural performance, GSES and MBI-GS (r = .316, -. 276, -. 344, all P < 0.01). Last, the score Of GSES played a partly mediating effect in the relationship between surface performance and MBI-GS, a partly mediating effect in the relationship between deep performance and MBI-GS, as well as a partly mediating effect in the relationship between natural performance and MBI-GS, with the mediation effect accounting for 14.5%, 41.7% and 39.4% of the total effect, respectively. It is therefore suggested that emotional labor not only has a direct role on the job burnout in college counselors, but also indirectly affects it through general self-efficacy.","PeriodicalId":298236,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2021)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211122.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics of job burnout, general self-efficacy and emotional labor in college counselors, and analyze the relationship among the 3 variables. Totally 538 college counselors were recruited through Internet from 7 universities in Guangdong Province. They were investigated with Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS), Emotional Labor Scale (ELS) and General Self - Efficacy Scale (GSES). The survey results indicate the following four points. First, the scores of MBI-GS, GSES, surface performance, deep performance and natural performance were (2.95±0.85), (2.42±.60), (4.45±.83), (4.27±.94) and (3.81±.85), respectively. Second, counselors with mild, moderate and severe job burnout accounted for 34.4%, 26.8% and 6.3%, respectively. Third, there was a pairwise correlation among the total score of surface performance, GSES and MBI-GS (r = - .104, .247, -.344, all P < 0.01), a pairwise correlation among the total score of deep performance, GSES and MBI-GS (r = .285, -. 235, -. 344, all P < 0.01), as well as a pairwise correlation among the total score of natural performance, GSES and MBI-GS (r = .316, -. 276, -. 344, all P < 0.01). Last, the score Of GSES played a partly mediating effect in the relationship between surface performance and MBI-GS, a partly mediating effect in the relationship between deep performance and MBI-GS, as well as a partly mediating effect in the relationship between natural performance and MBI-GS, with the mediation effect accounting for 14.5%, 41.7% and 39.4% of the total effect, respectively. It is therefore suggested that emotional labor not only has a direct role on the job burnout in college counselors, but also indirectly affects it through general self-efficacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学辅导员工作倦怠与情绪劳动的关系:一般自我效能感的中介作用
本研究旨在探讨高校辅导员的工作倦怠、一般自我效能感和情绪劳动的特征,并分析三者之间的关系。通过网络招募了广东省7所高校的538名辅导员。采用Maslach职业倦怠量表(MBI-GS)、情绪劳动量表(ELS)和一般自我效能量表(GSES)进行调查。调查结果显示了以下四点。第一,MBI-GS、GSES、表面表现、深层表现和自然表现得分分别为(2.95±0.85)、(2.42±0.60)、(4.45±0.83)、(4.27±0.94)和(3.81±0.85)分。其次,轻度、中度和重度工作倦怠的心理咨询师分别占34.4%、26.8%和6.3%。表面表现总分与GSES、MBI-GS呈两两相关(r = - 0.104、0.247、-)。344,均P < 0.01),深层表现总分、GSES和MBI-GS之间呈两两相关(r = 0.285, -。235年-。344,均P < 0.01),自然表现总分、GSES和MBI-GS之间呈两两相关(r = 0.316, -。276年-。344,均P < 0.01)。最后,GSES分数在表层绩效与MBI-GS之间、在深层绩效与MBI-GS之间、在自然绩效与MBI-GS之间均起部分中介作用,分别占总效应的14.5%、41.7%和39.4%。由此可见,情绪劳动不仅对辅导员的工作倦怠有直接影响,而且还通过一般自我效能感间接影响辅导员的工作倦怠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scaffolding Process in the International Business Correspondence Course in Vocational Colleges Integrating Ideological and Political Education into College English Blended Teaching The Analysis on Blended Teaching in College EFL Writing Course Based on The Production-Oriented Approach Research Progress of Leadership from the Perspective of Partnership and Followership An Exploration Into Innovative Teaching Design of the Course of Economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1