Structural Dynamic Testing Results for Air-Independent Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Technologies for Space Applications

Ryan P. Gilligan, Ian J. Jakupca, Phillip Smith, W. Bennett, M. Guzik, H. Kacher
{"title":"Structural Dynamic Testing Results for Air-Independent Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Technologies for Space Applications","authors":"Ryan P. Gilligan, Ian J. Jakupca, Phillip Smith, W. Bennett, M. Guzik, H. Kacher","doi":"10.1115/imece2019-11691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In 2016, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) project office funded testing at the NASA Glenn Research Center to evaluate the maturity of the Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cell technology and its viability for supporting launch vehicle and space applications. This technology evaluation included vibration, reactant purity, and vacuum exposure sensitivity testing. The evaluation process did not include microgravity testing. This paper discusses the vibration sensitivity testing of two air-independent fuel cell stacks provided by different vendors to assess the ability of currently available fuel cell stack hardware to survive the projected random vibrational environment that would be encountered in an upper stage launch vehicle. Baseline performance testing was utilized to quantify stack performance and overboard leak rate at standard atmospheric conditions in order to provide a reference for posttest comparison. Both fuel cell stacks were tested at a random vibration qualification level of 10.4 grms for five minutes in each axis. Low-level sinusoidal sweeps were conducted before and after each random vibration level run to see if any significant change in resonances were detected. Following vibration facility testing, the baseline performance testing was repeated. Test results demonstrated no measurable change in fuel cell electrochemical or mechanical performance, indicating that the two evaluated PEM fuel cell stacks may be suitable for space applications pending microgravity testing.","PeriodicalId":119220,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Advances in Aerospace Technology","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Advances in Aerospace Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2019-11691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2016, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Advanced Exploration Systems (AES) project office funded testing at the NASA Glenn Research Center to evaluate the maturity of the Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cell technology and its viability for supporting launch vehicle and space applications. This technology evaluation included vibration, reactant purity, and vacuum exposure sensitivity testing. The evaluation process did not include microgravity testing. This paper discusses the vibration sensitivity testing of two air-independent fuel cell stacks provided by different vendors to assess the ability of currently available fuel cell stack hardware to survive the projected random vibrational environment that would be encountered in an upper stage launch vehicle. Baseline performance testing was utilized to quantify stack performance and overboard leak rate at standard atmospheric conditions in order to provide a reference for posttest comparison. Both fuel cell stacks were tested at a random vibration qualification level of 10.4 grms for five minutes in each axis. Low-level sinusoidal sweeps were conducted before and after each random vibration level run to see if any significant change in resonances were detected. Following vibration facility testing, the baseline performance testing was repeated. Test results demonstrated no measurable change in fuel cell electrochemical or mechanical performance, indicating that the two evaluated PEM fuel cell stacks may be suitable for space applications pending microgravity testing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间应用不依赖空气质子交换膜(PEM)燃料电池技术的结构动态测试结果
2016年,美国国家航空航天局(NASA)先进探索系统(AES)项目办公室资助了NASA格伦研究中心的测试,以评估质子交换膜(PEM)燃料电池技术的成熟度及其支持运载火箭和空间应用的可行性。该技术评估包括振动、反应物纯度和真空暴露灵敏度测试。评估过程不包括微重力测试。本文讨论了不同供应商提供的两种不依赖空气的燃料电池堆的振动灵敏度测试,以评估当前可用的燃料电池堆硬件在预计的随机振动环境中生存的能力,这些环境将在高段运载火箭中遇到。基线性能测试用于量化标准大气条件下的堆栈性能和舷外泄漏率,以便为测试后比较提供参考。两个燃料电池堆在每个轴上的随机振动合格水平为10.4克,持续5分钟。在每个随机振动水平运行之前和之后进行低水平正弦扫描,以观察是否检测到任何显著的共振变化。在振动设备测试之后,重复进行基准性能测试。测试结果表明,燃料电池的电化学或机械性能没有可测量的变化,这表明两个经评估的PEM燃料电池堆可能适合用于微重力测试之前的空间应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Best Structural Theories for Free Vibrations of Sandwich Composites via Machine Learning Effect of Cryogenic Temperature Rolling on High Speed Impact Behavior of AA 6082 Thin Targets Neural Network Inverse Based Omnidirectional Rotation Decoupling Control to the Electrodynamic Reaction Sphere Structural Dynamic Testing Results for Air-Independent Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell Technologies for Space Applications Effect of Shear Overloads on Crack Propagation in Al-7075 Under In-Plane Biaxial Fatigue Loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1