RE-ESTABLISHING THE PREVALENCE OF EMAIL BULLYING

Benjamin M. Silverstone
{"title":"RE-ESTABLISHING THE PREVALENCE OF EMAIL BULLYING","authors":"Benjamin M. Silverstone","doi":"10.20472/BMC.2019.009.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Purpose: the purpose of this study is to re-evaluate the prevalence of email bullying as a result of a paucity of research on the topic in recent years. As workplace bullying continues to be a topical subject, and electronic communications continue to dominate workplace interactions, the importance of bullying requires highlighting. Results: Bullying and uncivil behaviour by email continue to be a concern to workers and the occurrences of email bullying have not changed significantly over a 20 year period. Managers continue to be more likely to report having been bullied by email and to have received inappropriate or uncivil communications. There does not appear to be a relationship between the sender considering the needs of the recipient and the rates of email bullying. Conclusions: Email bullying continues to be a concern with rates varying between 4% and 19.1% depending on employment role. Aggressiveness in email is also a significant concern with rates between 24.6% and 56.5% depending on employment role. There are no discernible reasons as to why managers are more likely report being bullied by email, but this study supports the conclusions of others on this topic and therefore it warrants further investigation.","PeriodicalId":325848,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th Business & Management Conference, Prague","volume":"298 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th Business & Management Conference, Prague","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20472/BMC.2019.009.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Purpose: the purpose of this study is to re-evaluate the prevalence of email bullying as a result of a paucity of research on the topic in recent years. As workplace bullying continues to be a topical subject, and electronic communications continue to dominate workplace interactions, the importance of bullying requires highlighting. Results: Bullying and uncivil behaviour by email continue to be a concern to workers and the occurrences of email bullying have not changed significantly over a 20 year period. Managers continue to be more likely to report having been bullied by email and to have received inappropriate or uncivil communications. There does not appear to be a relationship between the sender considering the needs of the recipient and the rates of email bullying. Conclusions: Email bullying continues to be a concern with rates varying between 4% and 19.1% depending on employment role. Aggressiveness in email is also a significant concern with rates between 24.6% and 56.5% depending on employment role. There are no discernible reasons as to why managers are more likely report being bullied by email, but this study supports the conclusions of others on this topic and therefore it warrants further investigation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新建立电子邮件欺凌的普遍性
目的:本研究的目的是重新评估电子邮件欺凌的普遍性,因为近年来对这一主题的研究不足。由于工作场所欺凌仍然是一个热门话题,电子通信继续主导工作场所的互动,欺凌的重要性需要强调。结果:通过电子邮件欺凌和不文明行为仍然是员工关注的问题,电子邮件欺凌的发生率在20年内没有显着变化。管理人员仍然更有可能报告受到电子邮件的欺凌,并收到不适当或不文明的通信。发件人考虑到收件人的需求和电子邮件欺凌率之间似乎没有关系。结论:电子邮件欺凌仍然是一个令人担忧的问题,根据就业角色的不同,其比例在4%到19.1%之间。电子邮件中的攻击性也是一个重要问题,根据就业角色的不同,这一比例在24.6%到56.5%之间。至于为什么管理者更有可能报告被电子邮件欺负,目前还没有明显的原因,但这项研究支持了其他人在这一主题上的结论,因此值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RE-ESTABLISHING THE PREVALENCE OF EMAIL BULLYING IDENTIFYING A BETTER MANAGEMENT METHOD IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE UNDER UNCERTAINTY CIRCUMSTANCES: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW POSSIBILITIES OF DIGITIZATION IN CONSTRUCTION DURING THE BUILDING LIFE CYCLE THERE'S A GOOGLE SCHOLAR ALERT FOR THAT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW METHODOLOGY EXPLORING MOBILE APP FEATURES THROUGH LEXIMANCER PROCESS ORIENTATION IN THE MODERN CONTROLLING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1