STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION OF ANCIENT UKRAINIAN APHORISMS

Nina Stankevych
{"title":"STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION OF ANCIENT UKRAINIAN APHORISMS","authors":"Nina Stankevych","doi":"10.30970/ufl.2021.15.3293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The material of the research is aphorisms of Ukrainian writers and philosophers from the 11th to the beginning of the 19th century, which were collected and arranged by Valery Shevchuk in the book “Eternal Wisdom”. The author claims the value of works of this genre, the power of ancient Ukrainian philosophical thought, its European context.\nThe action of the aphorism as an independent semantic organism occurs in a combination of logically coherent syntactic construction and artistic and stylistic means. The methods of constructing ancient philosophical thought, the conciseness of verbal complexes, and the formation of structural models of aphorisms are of scientific interest.\nAn aphorism is a short judgment of a generalizing nature, which reflects the subjective vision of a certain fragment of reality, it has a philosophical meaning, figurative and artistic form, and aesthetic value. Characteristic features of aphorisms: brevity, depth of content, linguistic expressiveness, aesthetic perfection, originality, didactics.\nThe classification of aphorisms according to a structural criterion consists of correlating them with a simple sentence, a complex sentence, or a supra-phrase unity. The choice of a certain logical structure depends on the general semantic idea of ​​the aphorism, associated with the linguistic way of expressing the semantic or figurative dominant.\nThe most productive syntactic constructions among ancient aphorisms-simple sentences are models A = B. The semantic core of an aphoristic expression is most often in the postposition. These models are classical and constitute a figurative-associative reaction to a certain logical-philosophical, ethical, aesthetic concept. Stylistic means – homogeneous members of the sentence, the inversion of the members of the sentence\nAmong complex sentences productive models of comparison-opposition, they form short logical judgments, built on the structural scheme: A, and B. The most common complex sentences with a conditional relationship. These are mostly logical aphorisms, their clear structural organization is evidence of a connection with paremias.\nAphorisms of analytical construction are divided into two-component and multicomponent. Multicomponent supra-phrase units are complete philosophical microtexts. The aesthetic perfection of these structures is achieved by stylistic devices: construction according to the «question-answer» scheme, use of anaphora, decomposition of a certain linguistic concept into semantic components, etc.\nAphorisms based on the principle of classification are successful. They are logically slender, rational, accurate, the number of components provides a clear, complete structure. There are often two components (3, 4). Such aphorisms facilitate perception, are better remembered, are autosemantic.\nThe structural types of the analyzed aphoristic massif testify to the perfection of the form and the aesthetic value of ancient aphorisms as linguistic and cultural signs.\nKey words: aphorism, syntactic strukture, composition, structural models, simple sentence, complex sentence, supra-phrase unity, artistic and figurative means.","PeriodicalId":153346,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Teaching Ukrainian as a Foreign Language","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Teaching Ukrainian as a Foreign Language","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30970/ufl.2021.15.3293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The material of the research is aphorisms of Ukrainian writers and philosophers from the 11th to the beginning of the 19th century, which were collected and arranged by Valery Shevchuk in the book “Eternal Wisdom”. The author claims the value of works of this genre, the power of ancient Ukrainian philosophical thought, its European context. The action of the aphorism as an independent semantic organism occurs in a combination of logically coherent syntactic construction and artistic and stylistic means. The methods of constructing ancient philosophical thought, the conciseness of verbal complexes, and the formation of structural models of aphorisms are of scientific interest. An aphorism is a short judgment of a generalizing nature, which reflects the subjective vision of a certain fragment of reality, it has a philosophical meaning, figurative and artistic form, and aesthetic value. Characteristic features of aphorisms: brevity, depth of content, linguistic expressiveness, aesthetic perfection, originality, didactics. The classification of aphorisms according to a structural criterion consists of correlating them with a simple sentence, a complex sentence, or a supra-phrase unity. The choice of a certain logical structure depends on the general semantic idea of ​​the aphorism, associated with the linguistic way of expressing the semantic or figurative dominant. The most productive syntactic constructions among ancient aphorisms-simple sentences are models A = B. The semantic core of an aphoristic expression is most often in the postposition. These models are classical and constitute a figurative-associative reaction to a certain logical-philosophical, ethical, aesthetic concept. Stylistic means – homogeneous members of the sentence, the inversion of the members of the sentence Among complex sentences productive models of comparison-opposition, they form short logical judgments, built on the structural scheme: A, and B. The most common complex sentences with a conditional relationship. These are mostly logical aphorisms, their clear structural organization is evidence of a connection with paremias. Aphorisms of analytical construction are divided into two-component and multicomponent. Multicomponent supra-phrase units are complete philosophical microtexts. The aesthetic perfection of these structures is achieved by stylistic devices: construction according to the «question-answer» scheme, use of anaphora, decomposition of a certain linguistic concept into semantic components, etc. Aphorisms based on the principle of classification are successful. They are logically slender, rational, accurate, the number of components provides a clear, complete structure. There are often two components (3, 4). Such aphorisms facilitate perception, are better remembered, are autosemantic. The structural types of the analyzed aphoristic massif testify to the perfection of the form and the aesthetic value of ancient aphorisms as linguistic and cultural signs. Key words: aphorism, syntactic strukture, composition, structural models, simple sentence, complex sentence, supra-phrase unity, artistic and figurative means.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古乌克兰语格言的结构组织
研究的材料是11世纪到19世纪初乌克兰作家和哲学家的格言,由瓦列里·舍夫丘克在《永恒的智慧》一书中收集和整理。作者声称这种类型的作品的价值,古代乌克兰哲学思想的力量,它的欧洲背景。警句作为一个独立的语义有机体,其作用是在逻辑连贯的句法结构与艺术和文体手段的结合中发生的。构建古代哲学思想的方法、语言复合体的简洁性以及格言结构模式的形成具有科学意义。警句是一种概括性的简短判断,它反映了对现实的某一片段的主观看法,具有哲学意义、具象艺术形式和审美价值。警句的特点:简洁、内容深刻、语言表现力强、审美完美、独创性强、说教性强。根据结构标准对警句进行分类,包括将警句与简单句、复杂句或超短语组合相关联。某种逻辑结构的选择取决于格言的一般语义概念,与表达语义或比喻优势的语言方式有关。古代格言句中最具生产力的句法结构是模式A = b。格言表达的语义核心通常在后置句中。这些模型是经典的,构成了对某种逻辑哲学、伦理和美学概念的形象联想反应。在复句中产生比较-对立模式的复句中,它们形成简短的逻辑判断,建立在结构图式:A和b之上。最常见的有条件关系的复句。这些大多是逻辑警句,它们清晰的结构组织是与空想有关的证据。分析结构警句分为双成分警句和多成分警句。多成分超短语单元是完整的哲学微文本。这些结构的美学完美是通过文体手段实现的:按照“问答”模式构建,使用回指,将某个语言概念分解为语义成分等。基于分类原则的格言是成功的。它们逻辑细长、合理、准确,元器件数量清晰、结构完整。通常有两个组成部分(3,4)。这样的警句有助于感知,更容易记住,是自语义的。所分析的警句群的结构类型证明了古代警句作为语言符号和文化符号的形式完善和审美价值。关键词:格言,句法结构,构成,结构模式,简单句,复杂句,短语上的统一,艺术和比喻手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SPORT LEXIS IN TEACHING UKRAINIAN AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE The Ukrainian language in HALYCHYNA school system in the interwar period STAGES OF ESTABLISHMENT OF COMPUTER TERMINOLOGY AGAINST THE BACKGROUND OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IN UKRAINE YOUTH SLANG IN MODERN STUDENTS’ SPEECH DEVELOPMENT OF TERMINOLOGICAL COMPETENCE OF STUDENTS MAJORING IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1