Nuclearity in RST and signals of coherence relations

Debopam Das
{"title":"Nuclearity in RST and signals of coherence relations","authors":"Debopam Das","doi":"10.18653/v1/W19-2705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the relationship between the notion of nuclearity as proposed in Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) and the signalling of coherence relations. RST relations are categorized as either mononuclear (comprising a nucleus and a satellite span) or multinuclear (comprising two or more nuclei spans). We examine how mononuclear relations (e.g., Antithesis, Condition) and multinuclear relations (e.g., Contrast, List) are indicated by relational signals, more particularly by discourse markers (e.g., because, however, if, therefore). We conduct a corpus study, examining the distribution of either type of relations in the RST Discourse Treebank (Carlson et al., 2002) and the distribution of discourse markers for those relations in the RST Signalling Corpus (Das et al., 2015). Our results show that discourse markers are used more often to signal multinuclear relations than mononuclear relations. The findings also suggest a complex relationship between the relation types and syntactic categories of discourse markers (subordinating and coordinating conjunctions).","PeriodicalId":243254,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Workshop on Discourse Relation Parsing and Treebanking 2019","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Workshop on Discourse Relation Parsing and Treebanking 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-2705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between the notion of nuclearity as proposed in Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) and the signalling of coherence relations. RST relations are categorized as either mononuclear (comprising a nucleus and a satellite span) or multinuclear (comprising two or more nuclei spans). We examine how mononuclear relations (e.g., Antithesis, Condition) and multinuclear relations (e.g., Contrast, List) are indicated by relational signals, more particularly by discourse markers (e.g., because, however, if, therefore). We conduct a corpus study, examining the distribution of either type of relations in the RST Discourse Treebank (Carlson et al., 2002) and the distribution of discourse markers for those relations in the RST Signalling Corpus (Das et al., 2015). Our results show that discourse markers are used more often to signal multinuclear relations than mononuclear relations. The findings also suggest a complex relationship between the relation types and syntactic categories of discourse markers (subordinating and coordinating conjunctions).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RST的核性与相干关系的信号
我们研究了修辞结构理论(RST)中提出的核性概念与连贯关系信号之间的关系。RST关系分为单核关系(包括一个核和一个卫星跨度)和多核关系(包括两个或多个核跨度)。我们研究了单核关系(例如,对偶,条件)和多核关系(例如,对比,列表)是如何通过关系信号,特别是话语标记(例如,因为,然而,如果,因此)来表示的。我们进行了一项语料库研究,检查了RST话语树库中两种关系的分布(Carlson等人,2002)以及RST信号语料库中这些关系的话语标记的分布(Das等人,2015)。我们的研究结果表明,话语标记更多地用于标记多核关系而不是单核关系。研究结果还表明,话语标记语(从属连词和协调连词)的关系类型与句法范畴之间存在复杂的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards the Data-driven System for Rhetorical Parsing of Russian Texts Nuclearity in RST and signals of coherence relations ToNy: Contextual embeddings for accurate multilingual discourse segmentation of full documents Toward Cross-theory Discourse Relation Annotation Towards discourse annotation and sentiment analysis of the Basque Opinion Corpus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1