Comparison of Two Polynomial Geoid Models of GNSS/Leveling Geoid Development for Orthometric Heights in FCT, Abuja

P. D. Oluyori, M. Ono, Eteje S. O.
{"title":"Comparison of Two Polynomial Geoid Models of GNSS/Leveling Geoid Development for Orthometric Heights in FCT, Abuja","authors":"P. D. Oluyori, M. Ono, Eteje S. O.","doi":"10.31695/IJERAT.2018.3330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ellipsoidal heights from GNSS require geoid model for conversion to orthometric height. The geoid model could be global, regional or local. The lack of national geoid model in Nigeria makes the development of local geoid very critical to local applications in place of integrated global geoid models. This study compares two polynomial geoid models for terrain representation in the FCT, Abuja. Nine coefficients were used to model the FCT surface for geoid interpolation and orthometric height modeling. Model A involved the use of the 2-D (x, y) positions while model B used 3-D (x, y, ∆h) where ∆h= (h ave – hi) the difference in average ellipsoidal height (h ave ) and each point’s ellipsoidal height (hi). The ∆h term is based on the assumption that the geoid varies with topography and may hence possibly lead to some improvements in the accuracy of orthometric height determination. DGPS observations were carried out to determine ellipsoid heights. Least squares adjustment was performed to compute the coefficients of the models. Model A achieved standard deviation of σ = 11 cm while Model B achieved σ = 13cm. Though Model B has a term that included highly accurate ellipsoidal height differences (∆h), it has not resulted into any accuracy improvement over the model A. Model A based on 2-D positions is hence the better of the two models. The t-test and hypothesis test at 95% confidence limit, however, showed that the two models did not differ significantly. Model A having lower standard deviation is recommended with GNSS determined ellipsoidal heights to determine orthometric heights within the FCT. This becomes an easy alternative to conventional spirit leveling technique for production of topographical maps, cadastral surveys, and engineering/environmental applications.","PeriodicalId":356862,"journal":{"name":"GeographyRN: Other Spatial Analysis (Sub-Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeographyRN: Other Spatial Analysis (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31695/IJERAT.2018.3330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Ellipsoidal heights from GNSS require geoid model for conversion to orthometric height. The geoid model could be global, regional or local. The lack of national geoid model in Nigeria makes the development of local geoid very critical to local applications in place of integrated global geoid models. This study compares two polynomial geoid models for terrain representation in the FCT, Abuja. Nine coefficients were used to model the FCT surface for geoid interpolation and orthometric height modeling. Model A involved the use of the 2-D (x, y) positions while model B used 3-D (x, y, ∆h) where ∆h= (h ave – hi) the difference in average ellipsoidal height (h ave ) and each point’s ellipsoidal height (hi). The ∆h term is based on the assumption that the geoid varies with topography and may hence possibly lead to some improvements in the accuracy of orthometric height determination. DGPS observations were carried out to determine ellipsoid heights. Least squares adjustment was performed to compute the coefficients of the models. Model A achieved standard deviation of σ = 11 cm while Model B achieved σ = 13cm. Though Model B has a term that included highly accurate ellipsoidal height differences (∆h), it has not resulted into any accuracy improvement over the model A. Model A based on 2-D positions is hence the better of the two models. The t-test and hypothesis test at 95% confidence limit, however, showed that the two models did not differ significantly. Model A having lower standard deviation is recommended with GNSS determined ellipsoidal heights to determine orthometric heights within the FCT. This becomes an easy alternative to conventional spirit leveling technique for production of topographical maps, cadastral surveys, and engineering/environmental applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GNSS/水准大地水准面开发的两种多项式大地水准面模型比较
来自GNSS的椭球高度需要大地水准面模型转换为正等高。大地水准面模型可以是全球的、区域的或局部的。由于尼日利亚缺乏国家大地水准面模型,因此开发当地大地水准面对于替代综合全球大地水准面模型在当地的应用至关重要。本研究比较了两种多项式大地水准面模型的地形表示在FCT,阿布贾。采用9个系数对FCT曲面进行大地水准面插值和正交高度建模。模型A使用二维(x, y)位置,模型B使用三维(x, y,∆h),其中∆h= (h ave - hi)平均椭球高度(h ave)与各点椭球高度(hi)之差。∆h项是基于大地水准面随地形变化的假设,因此可能会在一定程度上提高正测高度测定的精度。利用DGPS观测确定椭球体高度。采用最小二乘平差计算模型系数。模型A的标准差为σ = 11 cm,模型B的标准差为σ = 13cm。虽然模型B有一个包含高精度椭球高度差(∆h)的项,但与模型a相比,它并没有导致任何精度的提高。因此,基于二维位置的模型a是两种模型中更好的。然而,95%置信限下的t检验和假设检验表明,两个模型没有显著差异。建议采用具有较低标准差的模型A,并结合GNSS确定的椭球体高度来确定FCT内的正交高度。在地形图制作、地籍测量和工程/环境应用中,这成为传统精神水准测量技术的简单替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Time-Space Compression Affect Analysts’ Forecast Performance? Comparison of Two Polynomial Geoid Models of GNSS/Leveling Geoid Development for Orthometric Heights in FCT, Abuja Socio-Economic Rights and Expanding Access to Justice in South Africa: What Can Be Done?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1