The Pendulum Swings: Reconsidering Corporate Criminal Prosecution

David M. Uhlmann
{"title":"The Pendulum Swings: Reconsidering Corporate Criminal Prosecution","authors":"David M. Uhlmann","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2642455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporate crime continues to occur at an alarming rate, yet disagreement persists among scholars and practitioners about the role of corporate criminal prosecution. Some argue that corporations should face criminal prosecution for their misconduct, while others would reserve criminal prosecution for individual corporate officials. Perhaps as a result of this conflict, there has been a dramatic increase over the last decade in the use of deferred prosecution and non-prosecution agreements for some corporate crimes, even as the government continues to bring criminal charges for other corporate crimes. To move beyond our erratic approach to corporate crime, we need a better understanding of what is accomplished by the criminal prosecution of corporations, a construct that considers retributive and utilitarian theories but also takes into account the expressive function of criminal law and the societal need for condemnation, accountability, and justice when crime occurs.In this article, I provide a justification for corporate criminal prosecution that identifies the moral content of corporate crime, considers the deterrent value of corporate prosecution, and explains why the expressive value of the criminal law is indispensable in the corporate context. Corporate wrongdoing has pernicious effects on our communities, the economy, and the environment, which warrant the condemnation the criminal law provides. Criminal prosecution of corporations upholds the rule of law, validates the choices of law-abiding companies, and promotes accountability. Together those values contribute to our sense that justice has been done when crime occurs, which enhances trust in the legal system, provides the opportunity for societal catharsis, and allows us to move forward in the aftermath of criminal activity. When corporations face no consequences for their criminal behavior, we minimize their lawlessness, and increase cynicism about the outsized influence of corporations.","PeriodicalId":350529,"journal":{"name":"Criminology eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2642455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Corporate crime continues to occur at an alarming rate, yet disagreement persists among scholars and practitioners about the role of corporate criminal prosecution. Some argue that corporations should face criminal prosecution for their misconduct, while others would reserve criminal prosecution for individual corporate officials. Perhaps as a result of this conflict, there has been a dramatic increase over the last decade in the use of deferred prosecution and non-prosecution agreements for some corporate crimes, even as the government continues to bring criminal charges for other corporate crimes. To move beyond our erratic approach to corporate crime, we need a better understanding of what is accomplished by the criminal prosecution of corporations, a construct that considers retributive and utilitarian theories but also takes into account the expressive function of criminal law and the societal need for condemnation, accountability, and justice when crime occurs.In this article, I provide a justification for corporate criminal prosecution that identifies the moral content of corporate crime, considers the deterrent value of corporate prosecution, and explains why the expressive value of the criminal law is indispensable in the corporate context. Corporate wrongdoing has pernicious effects on our communities, the economy, and the environment, which warrant the condemnation the criminal law provides. Criminal prosecution of corporations upholds the rule of law, validates the choices of law-abiding companies, and promotes accountability. Together those values contribute to our sense that justice has been done when crime occurs, which enhances trust in the legal system, provides the opportunity for societal catharsis, and allows us to move forward in the aftermath of criminal activity. When corporations face no consequences for their criminal behavior, we minimize their lawlessness, and increase cynicism about the outsized influence of corporations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钟摆摇摆:重新考虑公司刑事起诉
公司犯罪继续以惊人的速度发生,但学者和从业人员对公司刑事起诉的作用仍然存在分歧。一些人认为,企业的不当行为应受到刑事起诉,而另一些人则认为,刑事起诉应保留给个别企业官员。也许是这种冲突的结果,在过去十年中,对一些公司犯罪使用延期起诉和不起诉协议的情况急剧增加,即使政府继续对其他公司犯罪提出刑事指控。为了超越我们对公司犯罪的不稳定的方法,我们需要更好地理解对公司的刑事起诉所完成的工作,这是一个考虑报复和功利主义理论的结构,但也考虑到刑法的表达功能以及犯罪发生时对谴责、问责和正义的社会需求。在本文中,我提供了一个公司刑事起诉的正当性,识别公司犯罪的道德内容,考虑公司起诉的威慑价值,并解释了为什么刑法的表达价值在公司背景下是不可或缺的。公司的不法行为对我们的社区、经济和环境产生了有害的影响,理应受到刑法的谴责。对企业的刑事起诉维护了法治,证实了守法企业的选择,促进了问责制。这些价值观共同使我们感到,当犯罪发生时,正义得到了伸张,这增强了对法律制度的信任,为社会宣泄提供了机会,并使我们能够在犯罪活动发生后继续前进。当企业的犯罪行为没有任何后果时,我们就会把它们的无法无天程度降到最低,并对企业的巨大影响力产生越来越多的怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Broken Windows Policing and Crime: Evidence from 80 Colombian Cities La indemnización por condenas erróneas: una visión desde el derecho comparado (Reparation for Wrongful Convictions: A Perspective from Comparative Law) Does More Entrepreneurship Benefit Society? The Effect on Community Crime Using a Quasi-Natural Experiment The Deterrent Effect of Surveillance Cameras on Crime The Breakdown of Anti-Racist Norms: A Natural Experiment on Normative Uncertainty after Terrorist Attacks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1