Evaluation of Cyclic Fatigue and Torsional Strength of Three Different Thermally Treated Reciprocating Nickel-Titanium Instruments

Dr. Ritika Singh, Dr. Anustha Kushwaha
{"title":"Evaluation of Cyclic Fatigue and Torsional Strength of Three Different Thermally Treated Reciprocating Nickel-Titanium Instruments","authors":"Dr. Ritika Singh, Dr. Anustha Kushwaha","doi":"10.58489/2836-5038/008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. This article's objective was to assess the reciprocating single-file systems Reciproc Blue 25.08 and Pro design R 25.06's cyclic and torsion fatigue resistance. The systems Reciproc Blue R25 (RB #25.08 taper), Prodesign R (PDR #25.06 taper), and WaveOne Gold (WOG #25.07 taper) (n = 20) were utilized to make sixty reciprocating instruments. The period to breakdown in an artificial stainless-steel canal with a 60° angle of curvature and a 5-mm radius was measured during cyclic fatigue resistance testing (n = 10). The torque and angle of rotation at failure of new instruments (n = 10) were assessed during the torsional test (ISO 3630-1) in the area 3 mm from the tip. Scanning electron microscopy was also used to view each fragment's shattered surface (SEM). In addition, a supplementary examination was performed to measure the cross- sectional area of each instrument 3 and 5 mm from the tip. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test, and the level of significance was set at 5%. Cycle Fatigue Resistance scores for PDR 25.06 were much higher (P 0.05). Both WOG 25.07 and RB 25.08 showed less resistance to fatigue (P 0.05). Based on the torsional analysis, PDR 25.06 had weaker torsional strength (P 0.05). No changes were found with RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07 (P > 0.05). PDR 25.06 showed higher angular rotation values than RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07. (P 0.05). Greater angular rotation was seen in both WOG 25.07 and RB 25.08. (P 0.05). The cross-sectional area analysis revealed that PDR 25.06 had the smallest cross-sectional areas at 3 and 5 mm from the tip (P 0.05). In comparison to RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07, PDR 25.06 had the highest cyclic fatigue resistance and angular rotation until fracture. Additionally, torsional strength was higher in RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07 than PDR 25.06. Clinical applicability in endodontic practise, reciprocating instruments that have undergone thermal treatment are used to prepare the root canals of canals that are curved and constrained; as a result, these instruments must exhibit high flexibility and suitable torsional strength to reduce the risk of instrument deformation.","PeriodicalId":330380,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stem Cells and Medicine","volume":"134 Supplement_1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stem Cells and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58489/2836-5038/008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. This article's objective was to assess the reciprocating single-file systems Reciproc Blue 25.08 and Pro design R 25.06's cyclic and torsion fatigue resistance. The systems Reciproc Blue R25 (RB #25.08 taper), Prodesign R (PDR #25.06 taper), and WaveOne Gold (WOG #25.07 taper) (n = 20) were utilized to make sixty reciprocating instruments. The period to breakdown in an artificial stainless-steel canal with a 60° angle of curvature and a 5-mm radius was measured during cyclic fatigue resistance testing (n = 10). The torque and angle of rotation at failure of new instruments (n = 10) were assessed during the torsional test (ISO 3630-1) in the area 3 mm from the tip. Scanning electron microscopy was also used to view each fragment's shattered surface (SEM). In addition, a supplementary examination was performed to measure the cross- sectional area of each instrument 3 and 5 mm from the tip. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test, and the level of significance was set at 5%. Cycle Fatigue Resistance scores for PDR 25.06 were much higher (P 0.05). Both WOG 25.07 and RB 25.08 showed less resistance to fatigue (P 0.05). Based on the torsional analysis, PDR 25.06 had weaker torsional strength (P 0.05). No changes were found with RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07 (P > 0.05). PDR 25.06 showed higher angular rotation values than RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07. (P 0.05). Greater angular rotation was seen in both WOG 25.07 and RB 25.08. (P 0.05). The cross-sectional area analysis revealed that PDR 25.06 had the smallest cross-sectional areas at 3 and 5 mm from the tip (P 0.05). In comparison to RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07, PDR 25.06 had the highest cyclic fatigue resistance and angular rotation until fracture. Additionally, torsional strength was higher in RB 25.08 and WOG 25.07 than PDR 25.06. Clinical applicability in endodontic practise, reciprocating instruments that have undergone thermal treatment are used to prepare the root canals of canals that are curved and constrained; as a result, these instruments must exhibit high flexibility and suitable torsional strength to reduce the risk of instrument deformation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三种不同热处理往复镍钛仪器的循环疲劳和扭转强度评价
目标。本文的目的是评估往复式单锉系统Reciproc Blue 25.08和Pro design R 25.06的循环和扭转疲劳抗力。系统Reciproc Blue R25 (RB #25.08锥度),Prodesign R (PDR #25.06锥度)和WaveOne Gold (WOG #25.07锥度)(n = 20)被用来制作60个往复仪器。在循环疲劳抗力试验中,测量了弯曲角为60°、半径为5mm的人工不锈钢管的破裂时间(n = 10)。在距尖端3mm的区域进行扭转测试(ISO 3630-1)时,评估新仪器(n = 10)失效时的扭矩和旋转角度。扫描电子显微镜也被用来观察每个碎片的破碎表面(SEM)。此外,还进行了补充检查,以测量每个仪器距离尖端3和5毫米的横截面积。数据分析采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验,显著性水平设为5%。PDR 25.06组的抗疲劳评分明显高于对照组(p0.05)。WOG 25.07和RB 25.08对疲劳的抵抗力较弱(P < 0.05)。扭转分析显示,PDR 25.06的扭转强度较弱(p0.05)。RB 25.08、WOG 25.07无明显变化(P > 0.05)。PDR 25.06的角旋转值高于RB 25.08和WOG 25.07。(P 0.05)。WOG 25.07和RB 25.08都有较大的角度旋转。(P 0.05)。截面积分析显示,PDR 25.06在距尖端3 mm和5 mm处截面积最小(P < 0.05)。与RB 25.08和WOG 25.07相比,PDR 25.06在断裂前具有最高的抗循环疲劳性和角旋转性。此外,RB 25.08和WOG 25.07的扭转强度高于PDR 25.06。在根管实践中的临床适用性,经过热处理的往复器械用于准备弯曲和受限的根管;因此,这些仪器必须具有高柔韧性和适当的扭转强度,以减少仪器变形的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Ultra Structural Analysis of The Huh7 Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Line's Response to Conditioned and Co-Culture Media Dynamics of the Nitrergic System in Experimental Hypercholesterolemia Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Injection on a Grade III Medial Collateral Ligament Tear in a Soccer Player: A Case Report Outcome of reconstructive surgeries with application of minimally invasive technique for correction of iatrogenic damage to the extra hepatic biliary tracts. Evaluation of Cyclic Fatigue and Torsional Strength of Three Different Thermally Treated Reciprocating Nickel-Titanium Instruments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1