Digital Security for Trans* Communities

Nour Shamas
{"title":"Digital Security for Trans* Communities","authors":"Nour Shamas","doi":"10.25159/2412-8457/4120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the examination of digital rights and privacy for marginalized communities with the human rights field and funding, trans* stories and needs are often marginalized and ignored. This article explores the lived realities of US-based trans* communities online. Two example cases are used to demonstrate how the current rhetoric around digital security and privacy do not take into account trans* perspectives. The article ends with some recommendations to improve the field of digital security and conversations on the intersection of trans* communities and digital rights.","PeriodicalId":297162,"journal":{"name":"Gender Questions","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Questions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-8457/4120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the examination of digital rights and privacy for marginalized communities with the human rights field and funding, trans* stories and needs are often marginalized and ignored. This article explores the lived realities of US-based trans* communities online. Two example cases are used to demonstrate how the current rhetoric around digital security and privacy do not take into account trans* perspectives. The article ends with some recommendations to improve the field of digital security and conversations on the intersection of trans* communities and digital rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨性别社区的数字安全
尽管有人权领域和资金在审查边缘化群体的数字权利和隐私,但跨性别者的故事和需求往往被边缘化和忽视。这篇文章探讨了美国在线跨性别社区的生活现实。本文用两个例子来说明当前围绕数字安全和隐私的言论是如何没有考虑到跨性别观点的。文章最后提出了一些建议,以改善数字安全领域,并就跨性别社区和数字权利的交叉进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Research Trends and Hotspots: A Bibliometric Analysis of Men who Have Sex with Men in Africa (2010–2021) Mixed-method Study on Gender Disparity in Healthcare Leadership Positions in Southern Ethiopia Exploring Research Trends and Hotspots: A Bibliometric Analysis of Men who Have Sex with Men in Africa (2010–2021) Mixed-method Study on Gender Disparity in Healthcare Leadership Positions in Southern Ethiopia Female Fear Factory, by Pumla Dineo Gqola
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1