Mixed-method Study on Gender Disparity in Healthcare Leadership Positions in Southern Ethiopia

Getachew Lenko Yimmam, Gloria Thupayagale-Tshweneagae, Rakgadi Grace Malapela
{"title":"Mixed-method Study on Gender Disparity in Healthcare Leadership Positions in Southern Ethiopia","authors":"Getachew Lenko Yimmam, Gloria Thupayagale-Tshweneagae, Rakgadi Grace Malapela","doi":"10.25159/2412-8457/13023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender disparity in healthcare leadership positions is a multifactorial phenomenon based primarily on how society has been socialised according to gender roles and defined how women and men progress in the workplace, including healthcare. The purpose of this mixed-method study was based on the theory of hostile and benevolent sexism as applied in organisations and explored gender disparity in healthcare leadership positions. Quantitative survey data were collected using a structured questionnaire from 414 healthcare professionals, and qualitative data were collected from 21 healthcare professionals using a semi-structured interview guide containing open questions. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS version 25. A descriptive phenomenology using Colaizzi’s (1978) approach was used for the qualitative strand. The findings show a noticeable increase in women’s promotion to low-level leadership positions. The quantitative results were corroborated by the qualitative findings, which confirmed that healthcare workers faced several challenges in getting promoted and that cultural bias persists. Participants of both genders reported that female promotions are negatively impacted by gender roles, inherent gender bias, and family responsibilities. This study documents changes in the way men view women’s abilities in the workplace. Although there are noticeable improvements in low-level leadership positions, serious issues persist, such as the lack of support for female healthcare workers with young families and limited recognition of women’s abilities to perform at the level of their male counterparts. It is crucial to establish gender-sensitive recovery interventions that facilitate women’s progress in leadership positions. Further research and empowerment programmes are necessary to enhance women’s self-assurance.\n ","PeriodicalId":297162,"journal":{"name":"Gender Questions","volume":"51 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Questions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2412-8457/13023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gender disparity in healthcare leadership positions is a multifactorial phenomenon based primarily on how society has been socialised according to gender roles and defined how women and men progress in the workplace, including healthcare. The purpose of this mixed-method study was based on the theory of hostile and benevolent sexism as applied in organisations and explored gender disparity in healthcare leadership positions. Quantitative survey data were collected using a structured questionnaire from 414 healthcare professionals, and qualitative data were collected from 21 healthcare professionals using a semi-structured interview guide containing open questions. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS version 25. A descriptive phenomenology using Colaizzi’s (1978) approach was used for the qualitative strand. The findings show a noticeable increase in women’s promotion to low-level leadership positions. The quantitative results were corroborated by the qualitative findings, which confirmed that healthcare workers faced several challenges in getting promoted and that cultural bias persists. Participants of both genders reported that female promotions are negatively impacted by gender roles, inherent gender bias, and family responsibilities. This study documents changes in the way men view women’s abilities in the workplace. Although there are noticeable improvements in low-level leadership positions, serious issues persist, such as the lack of support for female healthcare workers with young families and limited recognition of women’s abilities to perform at the level of their male counterparts. It is crucial to establish gender-sensitive recovery interventions that facilitate women’s progress in leadership positions. Further research and empowerment programmes are necessary to enhance women’s self-assurance.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于埃塞俄比亚南部医疗保健领导岗位性别差异的混合方法研究
医疗保健领导职位中的性别差异是一个多因素现象,主要基于社会如何根据性别角色进行社会化,以及如何定义女性和男性在工作场所(包括医疗保健领域)的发展。这项混合方法研究的目的是以组织中应用的敌意和善意性别歧视理论为基础,探讨医疗保健领导职位中的性别差异。研究使用结构化问卷收集了 414 名医疗保健专业人员的定量调查数据,并使用包含开放式问题的半结构化访谈指南收集了 21 名医疗保健专业人员的定性数据。定量数据使用 SPSS 25 版进行分析。定性分析采用了 Colaizzi(1978 年)的描述性现象学方法。研究结果表明,妇女晋升到低级领导岗位的人数明显增加。定性研究结果也证实了定量研究结果,证实了医护人员在晋升方面面临着一些挑战,而且文化偏见依然存在。男女参与者都表示,女性晋升受到性别角色、固有性别偏见和家庭责任的负面影响。这项研究记录了男性对女性工作能力看法的变化。尽管在低级领导岗位上有了明显改善,但严重的问题依然存在,例如对有年轻家庭的女性医护人员缺乏支持,以及对女性能力的认可有限,无法达到男性同行的水平。关键是要制定对性别问题有敏感认识的恢复干预措施,以促进妇女在领导岗位上取得进步。有必要开展进一步的研究和赋权方案,以增强妇女的自信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Research Trends and Hotspots: A Bibliometric Analysis of Men who Have Sex with Men in Africa (2010–2021) Mixed-method Study on Gender Disparity in Healthcare Leadership Positions in Southern Ethiopia Exploring Research Trends and Hotspots: A Bibliometric Analysis of Men who Have Sex with Men in Africa (2010–2021) Mixed-method Study on Gender Disparity in Healthcare Leadership Positions in Southern Ethiopia Female Fear Factory, by Pumla Dineo Gqola
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1