Protection of Private Equity Investors under the Dodd-Frank Act

Doris Toyou
{"title":"Protection of Private Equity Investors under the Dodd-Frank Act","authors":"Doris Toyou","doi":"10.5195/JLC.2019.159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In securities law, investor protection means that an issuer of securities, here partnership interests for private equity, must register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and be subject to disclosure, reporting, record-keeping compliance and examination programs. This Article argues that the Dodd-Frank Act has fulfilled part of its objective to protect private equity investors by forcing private equity managers to disclose information on their operations. Disclosure has provided greater transparency about how the business of private equity is conducted. The increased SEC scrutiny started in 2014 has uncovered unfair practices and violations of fiduciary duties that sophisticated investors could not detect on their own. Notwithstanding this improved transparency, the Dodd-Frank Act still falls short of imposing the main tool securities laws uses to protect investors: that is, full and fair disclosure. In other words, Dodd-Frank does not provide all the required protections that are important for investors to assess the quality of their investments and make informed decisions. This Article offers to expand transparency by additional public disclosure of investment returns, fees, and managers’ income.For other policy issues unrelated to the protection of investors, that is, jobs or tax, Title IV of the Dodd-Frank Act does not offer the appropriate setting. Applying or enacting legislation concerning tax, labor or bankruptcy laws can better curve the controversial practices of private equity firms.","PeriodicalId":271965,"journal":{"name":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"443 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pittsburgh School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/JLC.2019.159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In securities law, investor protection means that an issuer of securities, here partnership interests for private equity, must register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and be subject to disclosure, reporting, record-keeping compliance and examination programs. This Article argues that the Dodd-Frank Act has fulfilled part of its objective to protect private equity investors by forcing private equity managers to disclose information on their operations. Disclosure has provided greater transparency about how the business of private equity is conducted. The increased SEC scrutiny started in 2014 has uncovered unfair practices and violations of fiduciary duties that sophisticated investors could not detect on their own. Notwithstanding this improved transparency, the Dodd-Frank Act still falls short of imposing the main tool securities laws uses to protect investors: that is, full and fair disclosure. In other words, Dodd-Frank does not provide all the required protections that are important for investors to assess the quality of their investments and make informed decisions. This Article offers to expand transparency by additional public disclosure of investment returns, fees, and managers’ income.For other policy issues unrelated to the protection of investors, that is, jobs or tax, Title IV of the Dodd-Frank Act does not offer the appropriate setting. Applying or enacting legislation concerning tax, labor or bankruptcy laws can better curve the controversial practices of private equity firms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多德-弗兰克法案对私募股权投资者的保护
在证券法中,投资者保护是指证券发行人(此处指私募股权的合伙权益)必须在美国证券交易委员会(“SEC”)注册,并遵守披露、报告、记录保存和审查程序。本文认为,《多德-弗兰克法案》(Dodd-Frank Act)通过迫使私募股权管理公司披露其运营信息,部分实现了其保护私募股权投资者的目标。信息披露提高了私人股本业务运作方式的透明度。美国证交会从2014年开始加强审查,发现了经验丰富的投资者自己无法发现的不公平做法和违反信托责任的行为。尽管透明度有所提高,但《多德-弗兰克法案》(Dodd-Frank Act)仍未能强制执行证券法用来保护投资者的主要工具:即全面、公平的信息披露。换句话说,多德-弗兰克法案没有提供所有必要的保护,而这些保护对投资者评估其投资质量和做出明智决策至关重要。本文提出通过额外公开披露投资回报、费用和经理收入来扩大透明度。对于与保护投资者无关的其他政策问题,即就业或税收,《多德-弗兰克法案》第四章没有提供适当的设置。适用或制定有关税法、劳动法或破产法的立法,可以更好地缓和私募股权公司有争议的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dark Money Darker? IRS Shutters Collection of Donor Data Protection of Private Equity Investors under the Dodd-Frank Act Mass Digitization in the eBook Market: Copyright Protections and Exceptions Charitable Organization Oversight: Rules v. Standards Governing Knowledge Commons -- Introduction & Chapter 1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1