{"title":"Trade","authors":"T. Alborn","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190603519.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After 1820, most Britons recognized that the tight money supplies created by the gold standard had the effect of periodically depressing economic activity. These downturns also linked gold to poor harvests, since grain imports drained the metal from the Bank of England, and protectionists predicted disastrous consequences for the country under free trade, owing to the additional strains that such imports would place on gold reserves. This chapter places these mercantilist anxieties in the context of older fears of bullion drains to India and China, since the arguments in the 1830s echoed earlier Orientalist ethnographies, and examines the liberal response, which tried to divert attention away from gold and toward the Bank’s lending practices. Class fissures widened in a political system that secured the fortunes of financiers (through the gold standard) and landed aristocrats (through the Corn Laws) but left factory owners and urban laborers on the outside looking in.","PeriodicalId":368963,"journal":{"name":"All That Glittered","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"All That Glittered","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190603519.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
After 1820, most Britons recognized that the tight money supplies created by the gold standard had the effect of periodically depressing economic activity. These downturns also linked gold to poor harvests, since grain imports drained the metal from the Bank of England, and protectionists predicted disastrous consequences for the country under free trade, owing to the additional strains that such imports would place on gold reserves. This chapter places these mercantilist anxieties in the context of older fears of bullion drains to India and China, since the arguments in the 1830s echoed earlier Orientalist ethnographies, and examines the liberal response, which tried to divert attention away from gold and toward the Bank’s lending practices. Class fissures widened in a political system that secured the fortunes of financiers (through the gold standard) and landed aristocrats (through the Corn Laws) but left factory owners and urban laborers on the outside looking in.
1820年以后,大多数英国人认识到,金本位制造成的货币供应紧张会周期性地抑制经济活动。这些经济衰退还将黄金与歉收联系在一起,因为谷物进口耗尽了英格兰银行(Bank of England)的金属,而保护主义者预测,由于这种进口将给黄金储备带来额外压力,自由贸易将给国家带来灾难性的后果。本章将这些重商主义的焦虑置于对黄金流向印度和中国的担忧的背景下,因为19世纪30年代的争论呼应了早期的东方主义民族志,并考察了自由派的反应,他们试图将注意力从黄金转移到世界银行的贷款实践上。阶级分歧在政治体系中扩大,这种政治体系确保了金融家(通过金本位)和土地贵族(通过《谷物法》)的财富,但让工厂主和城市工人在外面观望。