GOING DIGITAL RUPIAH: SOME CONSIDERATIONS FROM SOVEREIGNTY AND CYBERSECURITY PERSPECTIVES

Z. Mahardika, Rizky Banyualam Permana, Nadia Maulisa
{"title":"GOING DIGITAL RUPIAH: SOME CONSIDERATIONS FROM SOVEREIGNTY AND CYBERSECURITY PERSPECTIVES","authors":"Z. Mahardika, Rizky Banyualam Permana, Nadia Maulisa","doi":"10.21098/jcli.v2i1.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Central banks worldwide are coming to terms with the bits and bytes of digital money, commonly referred to as Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). CBDC has been claimed to be safer, more secure, and inherently less volatile, unlike cryptocurrencies, as it is issued and regulated by central banks. The development of digital currency not only emerged in, and isolated developed countries’ monetary policy but also came from the emerging markets. However, the policy and academic discussion on CBDC is clouded as only a significant minority of states have instituted it. From a regulatory point of view, the basic concept of CBDC is still significantly understudied. Among the emerging scholarship, there remains a paucity of study on the (legal) aspects of cybersecurity risk and resilience of the proposed CBDC. This paper explores the role of Bank Indonesia (BI), as the central bank, in implementing CBDC and conducts a preliminary expose associated with cybersecurity risks. This paper shows that CBDC understood as not only usage of Digital Ledger Technologies, (DLTs), but in all models of electronic payment. There are diverging models for the implementation of CBDC, some models involve multiple actors and electronic systems. However, as a currency the Central Bank would ultimately bear the liability for each transaction. Therefore, it is important for BI, as the central bank, consider cybersecurity risks associated with the implementation of CBDC. Cybersecurity risks in the financial sectors including CBDC, is the potential disruption caused by cyber-attacks, IT failures, personnel, and physical or infrastructure security risks.","PeriodicalId":292753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v2i1.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Central banks worldwide are coming to terms with the bits and bytes of digital money, commonly referred to as Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). CBDC has been claimed to be safer, more secure, and inherently less volatile, unlike cryptocurrencies, as it is issued and regulated by central banks. The development of digital currency not only emerged in, and isolated developed countries’ monetary policy but also came from the emerging markets. However, the policy and academic discussion on CBDC is clouded as only a significant minority of states have instituted it. From a regulatory point of view, the basic concept of CBDC is still significantly understudied. Among the emerging scholarship, there remains a paucity of study on the (legal) aspects of cybersecurity risk and resilience of the proposed CBDC. This paper explores the role of Bank Indonesia (BI), as the central bank, in implementing CBDC and conducts a preliminary expose associated with cybersecurity risks. This paper shows that CBDC understood as not only usage of Digital Ledger Technologies, (DLTs), but in all models of electronic payment. There are diverging models for the implementation of CBDC, some models involve multiple actors and electronic systems. However, as a currency the Central Bank would ultimately bear the liability for each transaction. Therefore, it is important for BI, as the central bank, consider cybersecurity risks associated with the implementation of CBDC. Cybersecurity risks in the financial sectors including CBDC, is the potential disruption caused by cyber-attacks, IT failures, personnel, and physical or infrastructure security risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向数字化印尼盾:从主权和网络安全角度的一些考虑
世界各地的中央银行都在接受数字货币,通常被称为中央银行数字货币(CBDC)。与加密货币不同,CBDC被认为更安全、更可靠、波动性更小,因为它是由央行发行和监管的。数字货币的发展不仅产生于、孤立于发达国家的货币政策,而且来源于新兴市场。然而,关于CBDC的政策和学术讨论是阴云密布的,因为只有少数国家制定了CBDC。从监管的角度来看,CBDC的基本概念仍未得到充分研究。在新兴的学术研究中,对拟议的CBDC的网络安全风险和弹性的(法律)方面的研究仍然缺乏。本文探讨了印度尼西亚银行(BI)作为中央银行在实施CBDC方面的作用,并进行了与网络安全风险相关的初步暴露。本文表明,CBDC不仅被理解为数字分类账技术(dlt)的使用,而且被理解为所有电子支付模式的使用。CBDC的实施有不同的模型,一些模型涉及多个参与者和电子系统。然而,作为一种货币,中央银行最终将承担每笔交易的责任。因此,作为央行,考虑与CBDC实施相关的网络安全风险对BI来说很重要。包括CBDC在内的金融领域的网络安全风险是指网络攻击、IT故障、人员以及物理或基础设施安全风险造成的潜在破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OPTIMAL CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY DESIGN FOR EMERGING ECONOMIES LEGAL PROTECTION OF BANK INDONESIA’S FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE DO POLITICALLY CONNECTED BANKS PERFORM BETTER IN A DEMOCRATIC ENVIRONMENT? INCREASING FISCAL AND ECONOMIC RESILIENCE POST PANDEMIC: EVIDENCE FROM SOUTH ASIAN COUNTRIES MAPPING CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY LITERATURE: LESSONS FOR GOVERNMENTS AND RESEARCH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1