Managers' Incentives to Avoid Meeting or Beating Earnings Expectations: The Role of Open Market Repurchases

Bruce K. Billings, Richard M. Morton, Tianming Zhang
{"title":"Managers' Incentives to Avoid Meeting or Beating Earnings Expectations: The Role of Open Market Repurchases","authors":"Bruce K. Billings, Richard M. Morton, Tianming Zhang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1266889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research on meeting or beating earnings expectations focuses on managers' incentives to keep stock prices inflated by avoiding negative earnings surprises. However, in certain situations, managers may be motivated to depress stock prices in order to maximize their utility. We hypothesize and find evidence suggesting that managers opportunistically avoid reporting earnings that meet or beat analyst expectations to depress stock prices and hence lower the cost of share repurchases. Complementary to this, we find that the decline in meeting or beating among firms repurchasing shares is temporary. Building on results in Gong et al. (2008), we also provide evidence that stock prices decline more substantially and consistently when firms fail to meet or beat relative to merely reporting negative performance-adjusted abnormal accruals, suggesting failing to meet or beat may reflect a more comprehensive and effective strategy to depress prices. Further, we find a substantial incremental downward price effect for failing to meet or beat after controlling for the sign of abnormal accruals. This study complements prior research that focuses on incentives to meet or beat expectations by presenting the \"other side of the story\" and therefore provides a more complete picture of managers' opportunistic behavior related to analysts' earnings expectations.","PeriodicalId":356551,"journal":{"name":"American Accounting Association Meetings (AAA)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Accounting Association Meetings (AAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1266889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research on meeting or beating earnings expectations focuses on managers' incentives to keep stock prices inflated by avoiding negative earnings surprises. However, in certain situations, managers may be motivated to depress stock prices in order to maximize their utility. We hypothesize and find evidence suggesting that managers opportunistically avoid reporting earnings that meet or beat analyst expectations to depress stock prices and hence lower the cost of share repurchases. Complementary to this, we find that the decline in meeting or beating among firms repurchasing shares is temporary. Building on results in Gong et al. (2008), we also provide evidence that stock prices decline more substantially and consistently when firms fail to meet or beat relative to merely reporting negative performance-adjusted abnormal accruals, suggesting failing to meet or beat may reflect a more comprehensive and effective strategy to depress prices. Further, we find a substantial incremental downward price effect for failing to meet or beat after controlling for the sign of abnormal accruals. This study complements prior research that focuses on incentives to meet or beat expectations by presenting the "other side of the story" and therefore provides a more complete picture of managers' opportunistic behavior related to analysts' earnings expectations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经理人避免达到或超过盈利预期的动机:公开市场回购的作用
之前关于达到或超过盈利预期的研究主要集中在经理人通过避免负面盈利意外来保持股价膨胀的动机上。然而,在某些情况下,管理者可能会被激励压低股价,以最大化他们的效用。我们假设并发现证据表明,管理者投机主义地避免报告达到或超过分析师预期的收益,以压低股价,从而降低股票回购成本。与此相辅相成的是,我们发现公司回购股票的会议或击败率的下降是暂时的。基于Gong等人(2008)的研究结果,我们还提供了证据表明,当公司未能达到或优于仅报告负面业绩调整后的异常应计利润时,股价下跌的幅度更大、更持续,这表明未能达到或优于业绩调整后的异常应计利润可能反映了一种更全面、更有效的抑价策略。此外,我们发现在控制了异常应计项目的迹象后,未能满足或击败的实质性增量下降价格效应。本研究通过呈现“故事的另一面”来补充先前的研究,该研究侧重于满足或超过预期的激励,因此提供了一个更完整的经理人机会主义行为与分析师收益预期相关的图景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unravelling the ‘Black Box’ of the Accounting Profession: Evidence from the IFRS for SMEs Pork Bellies and Public Company Audits: Have Audits Once Again Become Just Another Commodity? Why Do Countries Mandate Accrual Accounting for Tax Purposes? Recession Analysts and Conservative Forecasting Rotten Apples and Sterling Examples: Moral Reasoning and Peer Influences on Honesty in Managerial Reporting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1