Pork Bellies and Public Company Audits: Have Audits Once Again Become Just Another Commodity?

Brant E. Christensen, Thomas C. Omer, Nathan Y. Sharp, Marjorie K. Shelley
{"title":"Pork Bellies and Public Company Audits: Have Audits Once Again Become Just Another Commodity?","authors":"Brant E. Christensen, Thomas C. Omer, Nathan Y. Sharp, Marjorie K. Shelley","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2184413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research has established that from 2000 to 2007, auditors incorporated clients’ financial reporting risk in their pricing of audit engagements (Charles et al. 2010; Doogar et al. 2010, 2013). However, regulators have expressed concern that the economic downturn and pressure from clients to reduce audit fees has had a negative impact on auditor effort. Our evidence suggests a marked decline in the pricing of financial reporting risk during the 2006-2010 period, further suggesting a reduced focus on the risk of misreporting during that period. This decline is particularly evident among non-industry expert auditors. Connecting these findings to audit quality, we observe a higher likelihood of subsequent accounting restatements among clients whose financial reporting risk appears to be insufficiently incorporated in audit fees, particularly among clients of small audit firm offices. Our results are consistent with a return to the commoditization of financial statement audits and its negative impact on audit quality.","PeriodicalId":356551,"journal":{"name":"American Accounting Association Meetings (AAA)","volume":"2017 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Accounting Association Meetings (AAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2184413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Prior research has established that from 2000 to 2007, auditors incorporated clients’ financial reporting risk in their pricing of audit engagements (Charles et al. 2010; Doogar et al. 2010, 2013). However, regulators have expressed concern that the economic downturn and pressure from clients to reduce audit fees has had a negative impact on auditor effort. Our evidence suggests a marked decline in the pricing of financial reporting risk during the 2006-2010 period, further suggesting a reduced focus on the risk of misreporting during that period. This decline is particularly evident among non-industry expert auditors. Connecting these findings to audit quality, we observe a higher likelihood of subsequent accounting restatements among clients whose financial reporting risk appears to be insufficiently incorporated in audit fees, particularly among clients of small audit firm offices. Our results are consistent with a return to the commoditization of financial statement audits and its negative impact on audit quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
猪肉肚腩与上市公司审计:审计是否再次成为一种商品?
先前的研究已经确定,从2000年到2007年,审计师将客户的财务报告风险纳入审计业务定价(Charles et al. 2010;Doogar et al. 2010, 2013)。然而,监管机构表示担心,经济低迷和客户要求降低审计费用的压力对审计师的工作产生了负面影响。我们的证据表明,2006-2010年期间财务报告风险的定价显著下降,进一步表明在此期间对误报风险的关注有所减少。这种下降在非行业专业审计人员中尤为明显。将这些发现与审计质量联系起来,我们观察到,在那些财务报告风险似乎没有充分纳入审计费用的客户中,特别是在小型审计事务所办事处的客户中,后续会计重述的可能性更高。我们的结果与财务报表审计商品化的回归及其对审计质量的负面影响是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unravelling the ‘Black Box’ of the Accounting Profession: Evidence from the IFRS for SMEs Pork Bellies and Public Company Audits: Have Audits Once Again Become Just Another Commodity? Why Do Countries Mandate Accrual Accounting for Tax Purposes? Recession Analysts and Conservative Forecasting Rotten Apples and Sterling Examples: Moral Reasoning and Peer Influences on Honesty in Managerial Reporting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1