How Did We Do?

Elizabeth A. McCune, Sarah R. Johnson
{"title":"How Did We Do?","authors":"Elizabeth A. McCune, Sarah R. Johnson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190939717.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of survey benchmark data, including where and how to access external survey benchmarks, what to consider when evaluating survey benchmarks, and a glimpse into the future of survey benchmarks. Practitioners are encouraged to evaluate the quality of benchmarks by considering both the generalizability of the sample used to generate the benchmarks as well as the comparability and relevance of benchmark items. Practitioners are also encouraged to consider how benchmarks can be used to drive action, where they might provide the most useful context, and the compromises and trade-offs required in the use of benchmarks.","PeriodicalId":192200,"journal":{"name":"Employee Surveys and Sensing","volume":"290 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Surveys and Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190939717.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of survey benchmark data, including where and how to access external survey benchmarks, what to consider when evaluating survey benchmarks, and a glimpse into the future of survey benchmarks. Practitioners are encouraged to evaluate the quality of benchmarks by considering both the generalizability of the sample used to generate the benchmarks as well as the comparability and relevance of benchmark items. Practitioners are also encouraged to consider how benchmarks can be used to drive action, where they might provide the most useful context, and the compromises and trade-offs required in the use of benchmarks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们做得怎么样?
本章的目的是提供调查基准数据的概述,包括在哪里以及如何访问外部调查基准,评估调查基准时要考虑什么,以及对调查基准的未来的一瞥。鼓励从业者通过考虑用于生成基准的样本的普遍性以及基准项目的可比性和相关性来评估基准的质量。还鼓励实践者考虑如何使用基准来推动行动,它们可能在哪些方面提供最有用的上下文,以及在使用基准时所需的妥协和权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open-Ended Questions How Did We Do? Data Visualization Linkage Analysis Focus Groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1