Comparison of Face Recognition Accuracy of ArcFace, Facenet and Facenet512 Models on Deepface Framework

A. Firmansyah, T. F. Kusumasari, E. N. Alam
{"title":"Comparison of Face Recognition Accuracy of ArcFace, Facenet and Facenet512 Models on Deepface Framework","authors":"A. Firmansyah, T. F. Kusumasari, E. N. Alam","doi":"10.1109/ICCoSITE57641.2023.10127799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Face recognition is one of the biometric-based authentication methods known for its reliability. In addition, face recognition is also currently very concerning, especially with the growing use and available technology. Many frameworks can be used for the face recognition process, one of which is DeepFace. DeepFace has many models and detectors that can be used for face recognition with an accuracy above 93%. However, the accuracy obtained needs to be tested, especially when faced with a dataset of Indonesian faces. This research will discuss the accuracy comparison of the Facenet model, Facenet512, from ArcFace, available in the DeepFace framework. From the comparison results, it is obtained that Facenet512 has a high value in accuracy calculation which is 0.974 or 97.4%, compared to Facenet, which has an accuracy of 0.921 or 92.1%, and ArcFace, which has an accuracy of 0.878 or 87.8%. The benefit of this research is to test how high the accuracy of the existing model in DeepFace is if tested with the Indonesian dataset. In this test, Facenet512 is the model that has the highest accuracy when compared to ArcFace and Facenet. This research is expected to help DeepFace users determine the best model to use and provide references to DeepFace developers for future development.","PeriodicalId":256184,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (ICCoSITE)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (ICCoSITE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCoSITE57641.2023.10127799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Face recognition is one of the biometric-based authentication methods known for its reliability. In addition, face recognition is also currently very concerning, especially with the growing use and available technology. Many frameworks can be used for the face recognition process, one of which is DeepFace. DeepFace has many models and detectors that can be used for face recognition with an accuracy above 93%. However, the accuracy obtained needs to be tested, especially when faced with a dataset of Indonesian faces. This research will discuss the accuracy comparison of the Facenet model, Facenet512, from ArcFace, available in the DeepFace framework. From the comparison results, it is obtained that Facenet512 has a high value in accuracy calculation which is 0.974 or 97.4%, compared to Facenet, which has an accuracy of 0.921 or 92.1%, and ArcFace, which has an accuracy of 0.878 or 87.8%. The benefit of this research is to test how high the accuracy of the existing model in DeepFace is if tested with the Indonesian dataset. In this test, Facenet512 is the model that has the highest accuracy when compared to ArcFace and Facenet. This research is expected to help DeepFace users determine the best model to use and provide references to DeepFace developers for future development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deepface框架下ArcFace、Facenet和Facenet512模型人脸识别精度比较
人脸识别是一种基于生物特征的身份认证方法,以其可靠性而闻名。此外,人脸识别目前也非常受关注,特别是随着技术的日益普及和可用性。人脸识别过程可以使用许多框架,其中之一是DeepFace。DeepFace有许多模型和检测器,可用于人脸识别,准确率超过93%。然而,获得的准确性需要进行测试,特别是当面对印度尼西亚面孔数据集时。本研究将讨论DeepFace框架中ArcFace的Facenet模型Facenet512的精度比较。对比结果表明,Facenet512的准确率计算值较高,为0.974或97.4%,而Facenet的准确率为0.921或92.1%,ArcFace的准确率为0.878或87.8%。这项研究的好处是测试DeepFace中现有模型在印度尼西亚数据集上的准确性有多高。在这个测试中,与ArcFace和Facenet相比,Facenet512是具有最高精度的模型。本研究有望帮助DeepFace用户确定使用的最佳模型,并为DeepFace开发人员未来的开发提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Customer Relationship Management, Customer Retention, and the Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction on a Healthcare Mobile Applications Revalidating the Encoder-Decoder Depths and Activation Function to Find Optimum Vanilla Transformer Model Goertzel Algorithm Design on Field Programmable Gate Arrays For Implementing Electric Power Measurement Instagram vs TikTok: Which Engage Best for Consumer Brand Engagement for Social Commerce and Purchase Intention? Air Pollution Prediction using Random Forest Classifier: A Case Study of DKI Jakarta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1