Analysing Wage Formation in the South African Labour Markets: The Role of Bargaining Councils

H. Bhorat, C. V. D. Westhuizen, Sumayya Goga
{"title":"Analysing Wage Formation in the South African Labour Markets: The Role of Bargaining Councils","authors":"H. Bhorat, C. V. D. Westhuizen, Sumayya Goga","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2184181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The role of bargaining councils, the central pillar of collective bargaining in South Africa, in the formation of wages is important in the context of high unemployment rates in South Africa. In this study we find that while institutionalised collective bargaining system covered substantially more formal sector workers in 2005 (30 percent) compared to 1995 (15 percent), this still meant that less than a third of the formally employed were covered by bargaining councils. Notwithstanding this, the overall rise in the number of workers covered by bargaining council agreements between 1995 and 2005 was driven almost primarily by the introduction of public sector councils. Thus, bargaining council coverage in the first decade of democracy is characterised by an erosion of coverage within the private sector bargaining council system on the one hand and the rapid rise of this system of bargaining in the public sector. On the other hand the descriptive data and multivariate models show therefore a significant wage premium associated with coverage under public sector councils in 2005, in excess of the large and significant union wage premium. The decline in the bargaining council system in the private sector is accompanied by declining wage premia for formal sector workers covered under private sector bargaining council agreements, with our preferred specification in 2005 indicating no significant private sector bargaining council wage premium.","PeriodicalId":206472,"journal":{"name":"INTL: Political & Legal Issues (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTL: Political & Legal Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2184181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

The role of bargaining councils, the central pillar of collective bargaining in South Africa, in the formation of wages is important in the context of high unemployment rates in South Africa. In this study we find that while institutionalised collective bargaining system covered substantially more formal sector workers in 2005 (30 percent) compared to 1995 (15 percent), this still meant that less than a third of the formally employed were covered by bargaining councils. Notwithstanding this, the overall rise in the number of workers covered by bargaining council agreements between 1995 and 2005 was driven almost primarily by the introduction of public sector councils. Thus, bargaining council coverage in the first decade of democracy is characterised by an erosion of coverage within the private sector bargaining council system on the one hand and the rapid rise of this system of bargaining in the public sector. On the other hand the descriptive data and multivariate models show therefore a significant wage premium associated with coverage under public sector councils in 2005, in excess of the large and significant union wage premium. The decline in the bargaining council system in the private sector is accompanied by declining wage premia for formal sector workers covered under private sector bargaining council agreements, with our preferred specification in 2005 indicating no significant private sector bargaining council wage premium.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析南非劳动力市场的工资形成:议价委员会的作用
谈判委员会是南非集体谈判的中心支柱,它在形成工资方面的作用在南非高失业率的情况下是重要的。在这项研究中,我们发现,与1995年的15%相比,制度化的集体谈判制度在2005年覆盖了更多的正式部门工人(30%),这仍然意味着不到三分之一的正式雇员被谈判委员会所覆盖。尽管如此,1995年至2005年期间谈判委员会协议所涵盖的工人人数的总体增长,几乎主要是由于引入了公共部门委员会。因此,在民主的第一个十年中,议价委员会的覆盖范围一方面是私营部门议价委员会系统内的覆盖范围受到侵蚀,另一方面是这种议价制度在公共部门的迅速兴起。另一方面,描述性数据和多变量模型显示,2005年公共部门委员会承保范围内的工资溢价显著高于工会工资溢价。随着私营部门谈判委员会制度的衰落,私营部门谈判委员会协议涵盖的正规部门工人的工资溢价也在下降,我们在2005年的首选规范表明,私营部门谈判委员会的工资溢价并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reverse Regulation? National Political Budget Cycles and the Moderating Power of Transnational Rating Agencies Wie Eurobonds Sinn machen könnten (How Eurobonds Could Make Sense) Governance and Social Media in African Countries: An Empirical Investigation Consumer Attitude and Behavior on Green Packaging in Korea A Chinese Model for Tax Reforms in Developing Countries?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1