Enabling Trade-offs Between Accuracy and Computational Cost: Adaptive Algorithms to Reduce Time to Clinical Insight

J. Dakka, Kristof Farkas-Pall, Vivek Balasubramanian, M. Turilli, S. Wan, D. Wright, S. Zasada, P. Coveney, S. Jha
{"title":"Enabling Trade-offs Between Accuracy and Computational Cost: Adaptive Algorithms to Reduce Time to Clinical Insight","authors":"J. Dakka, Kristof Farkas-Pall, Vivek Balasubramanian, M. Turilli, S. Wan, D. Wright, S. Zasada, P. Coveney, S. Jha","doi":"10.1109/CCGRID.2018.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficacy of drug treatments depends on how tightly small molecules bind to their target proteins. Quantifying the strength of these interactions (the so called ‘binding affinity’) is a grand challenge of computational chemistry, surmounting which could revolutionize drug design and provide the platform for patient specific medicine. Recently, evidence from blind challenge predictions and retrospective validation studies has suggested that molecular dynamics (MD) can now achieve useful predictive accuracy ( 1 kcal/mol) This accuracy is sufficient to greatly accelerate hit to lead and lead optimization. To translate these advances in predictive accuracy so as to impact clinical and/or industrial decision making requires that binding free energy results must be turned around on reduced timescales without loss of accuracy. This demands advances in algorithms, scalable software systems, and intelligent and efficient utilization of supercomputing resources. This work is motivated by the real world problem of providing insight from drug candidate data on a time scale that is as short as possible. Specifically, we reproduce results from a collaborative project between UCL and GlaxoSmithKline to study a congeneric series of drug candidates binding to the BRD4 protein – inhibitors of which have shown promising preclinical efficacy in pathologies ranging from cancer to inflammation. We demonstrate the use of a framework called HTBAC, designed to support the aforementioned requirements of accurate and rapid drug binding affinity calculations. HTBAC facilitates the execution of the numbers of simulations while supporting the adaptive execution of algorithms. Furthermore, HTBAC enables the selection of simulation parameters during runtime which can, in principle, optimize the use of computational resources whilst producing results within a target uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":321027,"journal":{"name":"2018 18th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 18th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGRID.2018.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The efficacy of drug treatments depends on how tightly small molecules bind to their target proteins. Quantifying the strength of these interactions (the so called ‘binding affinity’) is a grand challenge of computational chemistry, surmounting which could revolutionize drug design and provide the platform for patient specific medicine. Recently, evidence from blind challenge predictions and retrospective validation studies has suggested that molecular dynamics (MD) can now achieve useful predictive accuracy ( 1 kcal/mol) This accuracy is sufficient to greatly accelerate hit to lead and lead optimization. To translate these advances in predictive accuracy so as to impact clinical and/or industrial decision making requires that binding free energy results must be turned around on reduced timescales without loss of accuracy. This demands advances in algorithms, scalable software systems, and intelligent and efficient utilization of supercomputing resources. This work is motivated by the real world problem of providing insight from drug candidate data on a time scale that is as short as possible. Specifically, we reproduce results from a collaborative project between UCL and GlaxoSmithKline to study a congeneric series of drug candidates binding to the BRD4 protein – inhibitors of which have shown promising preclinical efficacy in pathologies ranging from cancer to inflammation. We demonstrate the use of a framework called HTBAC, designed to support the aforementioned requirements of accurate and rapid drug binding affinity calculations. HTBAC facilitates the execution of the numbers of simulations while supporting the adaptive execution of algorithms. Furthermore, HTBAC enables the selection of simulation parameters during runtime which can, in principle, optimize the use of computational resources whilst producing results within a target uncertainty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使准确性和计算成本之间的权衡:自适应算法,以减少时间到临床洞察
药物治疗的效果取决于小分子与靶蛋白结合的紧密程度。量化这些相互作用的强度(所谓的“结合亲和力”)是计算化学的一个巨大挑战,超越它可以彻底改变药物设计并为患者特异性药物提供平台。最近,来自盲挑战预测和回顾性验证研究的证据表明,分子动力学(MD)现在可以达到有用的预测精度(1 kcal/mol),这种精度足以大大加速命中先导和先导优化。为了将这些预测准确性的进步转化为影响临床和/或工业决策,需要在不损失准确性的情况下,在缩短的时间尺度上扭转结合自由能结果。这需要在算法、可扩展的软件系统以及超级计算资源的智能和高效利用方面取得进步。这项工作的动机是在尽可能短的时间内从候选药物数据中提供洞察力的现实世界问题。具体来说,我们重现了伦敦大学学院和葛兰素史克公司合作项目的结果,该项目研究了一系列与BRD4蛋白抑制剂结合的同源候选药物,这些药物在从癌症到炎症的病理中显示出有希望的临床前疗效。我们演示了一个名为HTBAC的框架的使用,旨在支持上述准确和快速的药物结合亲和力计算的要求。HTBAC促进了大量模拟的执行,同时支持算法的自适应执行。此外,HTBAC允许在运行时选择仿真参数,原则上可以优化计算资源的使用,同时在目标不确定性范围内产生结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extreme-Scale Realistic Stencil Computations on Sunway TaihuLight with Ten Million Cores RideMatcher: Peer-to-Peer Matching of Passengers for Efficient Ridesharing Nitro: Network-Aware Virtual Machine Image Management in Geo-Distributed Clouds Improving Energy Efficiency of Database Clusters Through Prefetching and Caching Main-Memory Requirements of Big Data Applications on Commodity Server Platform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1