The evolving role of the OSCE in the shaping of european security

M. Freire
{"title":"The evolving role of the OSCE in the shaping of european security","authors":"M. Freire","doi":"10.21638/spbu06.2022.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the role of the CSCE/OSCE in the shaping of European security. The 1975 Helsinki Final Act put forward a broad understanding of security, implying economic, societal and other non-traditional dimensions of security, which was an innovation at the time, and promoted the idea of comprehensive security. The fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Soviet Union were understood then as an opportunity for promoting the “Common European home” principles as put forward by Gorbachev. This new context conferred a renewed sense of belonging to the “wide Europe” with no dividing walls. However, European security evolved differently; with different understandings and perceptions about the “other” taking shape, and creating lines of dissension in the articulation of an inclusive security order sought by the OSCE. The article argues the OSCE had difficulties in adjusting to the new postCold War security context, providing a mixed assessment of the organisation’s role in European security. This is so due to several factors, including the working rules of the organisation, the role and positioning of Russia within and towards the OSCE, and the drawing of the European security architecture around NATO and what this means to the OSCE as a piece in the European security puzzle.","PeriodicalId":336122,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International relations","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2022.201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses the role of the CSCE/OSCE in the shaping of European security. The 1975 Helsinki Final Act put forward a broad understanding of security, implying economic, societal and other non-traditional dimensions of security, which was an innovation at the time, and promoted the idea of comprehensive security. The fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Soviet Union were understood then as an opportunity for promoting the “Common European home” principles as put forward by Gorbachev. This new context conferred a renewed sense of belonging to the “wide Europe” with no dividing walls. However, European security evolved differently; with different understandings and perceptions about the “other” taking shape, and creating lines of dissension in the articulation of an inclusive security order sought by the OSCE. The article argues the OSCE had difficulties in adjusting to the new postCold War security context, providing a mixed assessment of the organisation’s role in European security. This is so due to several factors, including the working rules of the organisation, the role and positioning of Russia within and towards the OSCE, and the drawing of the European security architecture around NATO and what this means to the OSCE as a piece in the European security puzzle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧安组织在形成欧洲安全方面不断演变的作用
本文分析了欧安会/欧安组织在形成欧洲安全方面的作用。1975年的《赫尔辛基最后文件》提出了对安全的广义理解,暗示了经济、社会等非传统安全维度,这在当时是一种创新,促进了全面安全的理念。柏林墙的倒塌和苏联的解体在当时被视为推动戈尔巴乔夫提出的“欧洲共同家园”原则的机会。这种新的环境赋予了一种新的归属感,即没有分隔墙的“广阔的欧洲”。然而,欧洲安全的演变有所不同;对“他者”的不同理解和看法正在形成,并在欧安组织寻求的包容性安全秩序的表述中产生分歧。文章认为,欧安组织在适应新的冷战后安全环境方面存在困难,并对该组织在欧洲安全中的作用进行了褒贬不一的评估。这是由几个因素造成的,包括该组织的工作规则,俄罗斯在欧安组织内部和对欧安组织的作用和定位,以及围绕北约的欧洲安全架构的绘制,以及这对欧安组织作为欧洲安全拼图中的一块意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Foreign economic cooperation between St. Petersburg and Denmark in the 21st century: Main trends, problems, prospects The pandemic, Russia and the West Russian — US public diplomacy: Comparative aspects and dialogue prospects Conferences on political modeling: Simulating European Union — Eurasian Economic Union negotiations Russian-American relations in a changing world: A new contribution to the discussion on the future of international order
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1