65 Yaş Üstü Osteoporoz Hastalarında Denosumab ve Zoledronik Asit in Yan Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması

Rabia Bağ Soytaş, Suna Avci, Hakan Yavuzer, Serdar Ozkok, Alper Döventaş, Deniz Suna Erdinçler
{"title":"65 Yaş Üstü Osteoporoz Hastalarında Denosumab ve Zoledronik Asit in Yan Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması","authors":"Rabia Bağ Soytaş, Suna Avci, Hakan Yavuzer, Serdar Ozkok, Alper Döventaş, Deniz Suna Erdinçler","doi":"10.15321/geneltipder.2021.300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We aimed to compare the rates of denosumab and zoledronic acid in patients receiving osteoporosis treatment and the side effects of these drugs. Material and Method: In our study, the files of the applicants were searched between January 2016-December 2017; those with denosumab and zoledronic acid. Clinical and demographic data, laboratory values of beginning of treatment, 6 months and 1 year and side effects were recorded. Results: 171 patients were included. Denosumab group was older, their urea and creatinine levels were higher and GFRs were lower (respectively, p: <0.001, p: <0.001, p: <0.001, p: <0.001). Hypocalcemia was observed only in denosumab group (1 (1.23%) patient). Acut renal failure occured in 4 (% 5,19) patients with denosumab and 2 (%2,12) patients with the other group during 1 month follow up. Flu-like symptomps were observed only in zoledronic asit group (2 (%2,12) patients). Bilateral spontaneous fracture of the ischium pubis was observed in 1 (1.29%) of the former, spontaneous 6 teeth loss in 1 (1.06%) of the latter group. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of side effects. Side effects were lower than those reported in the literature; in addition to comorbidity, multiple drug use and rare side effects should be kept in mind.","PeriodicalId":139503,"journal":{"name":"Genel Tip Dergisi","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genel Tip Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15321/geneltipder.2021.300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to compare the rates of denosumab and zoledronic acid in patients receiving osteoporosis treatment and the side effects of these drugs. Material and Method: In our study, the files of the applicants were searched between January 2016-December 2017; those with denosumab and zoledronic acid. Clinical and demographic data, laboratory values of beginning of treatment, 6 months and 1 year and side effects were recorded. Results: 171 patients were included. Denosumab group was older, their urea and creatinine levels were higher and GFRs were lower (respectively, p: <0.001, p: <0.001, p: <0.001, p: <0.001). Hypocalcemia was observed only in denosumab group (1 (1.23%) patient). Acut renal failure occured in 4 (% 5,19) patients with denosumab and 2 (%2,12) patients with the other group during 1 month follow up. Flu-like symptomps were observed only in zoledronic asit group (2 (%2,12) patients). Bilateral spontaneous fracture of the ischium pubis was observed in 1 (1.29%) of the former, spontaneous 6 teeth loss in 1 (1.06%) of the latter group. Conclusion: There were no significant differences between two groups in terms of side effects. Side effects were lower than those reported in the literature; in addition to comorbidity, multiple drug use and rare side effects should be kept in mind.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的:比较denosumab和唑来膦酸在骨质疏松症患者中的应用比例及其副作用。材料与方法:在我们的研究中,检索了2016年1月至2017年12月期间申请人的档案;使用denosumab和唑来膦酸的患者。记录两组患者的临床、人口学资料、治疗开始、6个月、1年的实验室数据及不良反应。结果:纳入171例患者。Denosumab组患者年龄较大,尿素和肌酐水平较高,gfr较低(分别为p <0.001, p <0.001, p <0.001, p <0.001)。低钙血症仅在地诺单抗组出现(1例(1.23%))。在1个月的随访中,denosumab组有4例(% 5.19)发生急性肾功能衰竭,另一组有2例(% 2.12)发生急性肾功能衰竭。只有唑来膦酸钠组出现流感样症状(2例(%2,12))。前者1例(1.29%)发生双侧耻骨坐骨自发骨折,后者1例(1.06%)发生6颗牙自发脱落。结论:两组患者的不良反应无显著差异。副作用比文献报道的要低;除了合并症外,多种药物使用和罕见的副作用也应牢记在心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tip 2 Diyabetes Mellituslu Hastaların Hastalıklarına Yönelik Tutum ve Davranışlarının İncelenmesi Cerrahi Hemşirelerin Basınç Yaralanması, Risk Faktörleri ve Önlenmeye İlişkin Bilgilerin İncelenmesi 65 Yaş Üstü Osteoporoz Hastalarında Denosumab ve Zoledronik Asit in Yan Etkilerinin Karşılaştırılması Künt Karın Travmasına Bağlı Solid Organ Yaralanmalarında Non operatif Tedavi-Dalak Yaralanmaları Miyokardiyal İskemi Oluşturan ve Sol Ventrikülografiyi Taklit Eden Kalıcı Tebesian Venlerin Ciddi Formu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1