{"title":"The Titles (and Subtitles) of Aristotle’s Lost Work on Homer","authors":"R. Mayhew","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198834564.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I examine four types of evidence for the titles of the lost work that is the focus of this book: (1) the three most reliable ancient biographies of Aristotle, which contain lists of Aristotle’s works; (2) passages from three other, less reliable, ancient biographies of Aristotle; (3) the only three fragments from the Homeric Problems which refer to a title; (4) the incipit (i.e. opening words) of Poetics 25. Of the two most likely titles (Προβλήματα Ὁμηρικά and Ἀπορήματα Ὁμηρικά), I have a preference for the latter. I also discuss the possible explanations for the variation in the number of books attributed to this work (six and ten), and I speculate about the possibility of subtitles (that is, separate titles for each of its six or ten books).","PeriodicalId":369038,"journal":{"name":"Aristotle's Lost Homeric Problems","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aristotle's Lost Homeric Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198834564.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
I examine four types of evidence for the titles of the lost work that is the focus of this book: (1) the three most reliable ancient biographies of Aristotle, which contain lists of Aristotle’s works; (2) passages from three other, less reliable, ancient biographies of Aristotle; (3) the only three fragments from the Homeric Problems which refer to a title; (4) the incipit (i.e. opening words) of Poetics 25. Of the two most likely titles (Προβλήματα Ὁμηρικά and Ἀπορήματα Ὁμηρικά), I have a preference for the latter. I also discuss the possible explanations for the variation in the number of books attributed to this work (six and ten), and I speculate about the possibility of subtitles (that is, separate titles for each of its six or ten books).