Bio efficacy of Eruca sativa oil against Callosobruchus chinensis on chickpea

{"title":"Bio efficacy of Eruca sativa oil against Callosobruchus chinensis on chickpea","authors":"","doi":"10.34091/ajls.3.2.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L. responsible for destroying qualitative and quantitative losses to most stored grains. Once the damage done by the beetle, the grains lose their nutritional and germination capacity and become unfit for either consumption. Seed treatment still mainly relies on heavy synthetic chemicals which cause residual effect and threaten public health. However, the natural plant products containing insecticidal activity have recently displayed a great scope as they tend to come up with low mammalian toxicity, less effect on environmental and broad public adoption. Therefore, an experiment was conducted with variable doses of Eruca sativa L. seed oil (0.5 ml, 1 ml, and 1.5 ml) against C. chinensis. The data were recorded for corrected mortality, repellent effects, and seed protectant at different intervals (24, 48, 72 hrs and 1 week). We found the higher corrected mortality (32.65%) at 1.5ml after 24 hrs. Later, the mortality percentage decreased at different intervals but remained higher at maximum dose of E. sativa. However, the overall highest mortality of C. chinensis was 50.00% at 1.5 ml and the lowest 41.00% at 0.5 ml. Meanwhile, the index showed repellent effect with R.I value <1 in all treatments at different intervals. The seed protectant data showed that the minimum number of 1.66±0.33 eggs laid on treated seeds at 1.5 ml and 8.00±1.15 eggs on untreated seeds in choice experiment. In total, maximum number of 17.33±4.93 eggs laid at 0.5 ml in choice experiment and minimum 4.83±1.51 eggs at 1.5 ml. However, in no choice experiment, the maximum number of 51.00±4.58 eggs on control treatment and minimum 0.33±0.33 eggs on 1.5 ml were laid by pulse beetle. The most effective dose of 1.5ml caused maximum mortality, repellent and seed protectant.","PeriodicalId":371643,"journal":{"name":"Abasyn Journal Life Sciences","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abasyn Journal Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34091/ajls.3.2.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L. responsible for destroying qualitative and quantitative losses to most stored grains. Once the damage done by the beetle, the grains lose their nutritional and germination capacity and become unfit for either consumption. Seed treatment still mainly relies on heavy synthetic chemicals which cause residual effect and threaten public health. However, the natural plant products containing insecticidal activity have recently displayed a great scope as they tend to come up with low mammalian toxicity, less effect on environmental and broad public adoption. Therefore, an experiment was conducted with variable doses of Eruca sativa L. seed oil (0.5 ml, 1 ml, and 1.5 ml) against C. chinensis. The data were recorded for corrected mortality, repellent effects, and seed protectant at different intervals (24, 48, 72 hrs and 1 week). We found the higher corrected mortality (32.65%) at 1.5ml after 24 hrs. Later, the mortality percentage decreased at different intervals but remained higher at maximum dose of E. sativa. However, the overall highest mortality of C. chinensis was 50.00% at 1.5 ml and the lowest 41.00% at 0.5 ml. Meanwhile, the index showed repellent effect with R.I value <1 in all treatments at different intervals. The seed protectant data showed that the minimum number of 1.66±0.33 eggs laid on treated seeds at 1.5 ml and 8.00±1.15 eggs on untreated seeds in choice experiment. In total, maximum number of 17.33±4.93 eggs laid at 0.5 ml in choice experiment and minimum 4.83±1.51 eggs at 1.5 ml. However, in no choice experiment, the maximum number of 51.00±4.58 eggs on control treatment and minimum 0.33±0.33 eggs on 1.5 ml were laid by pulse beetle. The most effective dose of 1.5ml caused maximum mortality, repellent and seed protectant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芥子油对鹰嘴豆上中国胼手虫的生物药效研究
脉冲甲虫(Callosobruchus chinensis L.)对大多数储粮造成定性和定量损失。一旦被甲虫破坏,谷物就会失去营养和发芽能力,变得不适合食用。种子处理仍主要依靠重合成化学品,产生残留效应,威胁公众健康。近年来,具有杀虫活性的天然植物产品因其对哺乳动物的毒性低、对环境的影响小、被广泛采用而显示出很大的应用前景。因此,本实验采用不同剂量的芥子油(0.5 ml、1 ml、1.5 ml)对中国月桂线虫进行了防治试验。在不同的时间间隔(24、48、72小时和1周)记录校正死亡率、驱避效果和种子保护剂的数据。我们发现1.5ml后24小时校正死亡率更高(32.65%)。之后,死亡率随时间间隔的变化而降低,但在最大剂量时仍保持较高的死亡率。但在1.5 ml处理下,蠋蝽的总死亡率最高为50.00%,0.5 ml处理下死亡率最低为41.00%,且各处理在不同时间间隔均表现出驱避效果,R.I值均<1。种子保护剂数据表明,在选择实验中,处理过的种子在1.5 ml时最小产卵数为1.66±0.33个,未处理过的种子最小产卵数为8.00±1.15个。在0.5 ml浓度下,选择处理的产蛋数最多为17.33±4.93个,在1.5 ml浓度下,产蛋数最少为4.83±1.51个。而在无选择处理的情况下,对照处理的产蛋数最多为51.00±4.58个,在1.5 ml浓度下,产蛋数最少为0.33±0.33个。最有效剂量为1.5ml,死亡率最高,有驱避和种籽保护剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Tumor Necrosis Factor-α and Susceptibility to HIV Infection in Local Population of Lahore Pakistan Bio efficacy of Eruca sativa oil against Callosobruchus chinensis on chickpea Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Concise Overview Insights into Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Critical Analysis on its Wide Aspects Identification, Screening, and Molecular Characterization of Bacterial Microbiota in the guts of Epinephelus sp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1