{"title":"Life Excluded from Law: Agamben, Biopolitics, and Civil War","authors":"G. Rae","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474445283.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on Giorgio Agamben’s work on biopolitical sovereignty. It focuses on Homo Sacer and State of Exception to show that Agamben links sovereign violence to the establishment of a state of exception, wherein life is controlled through its exclusion from the juridical order. With this, Agamben continues the biopolitical line that sovereignty is orientated towards the regulation of life rather than the establishment of juridical order. The second part of the chapter ties this to Agamben’s discussion of civil war to argue that, contra Foucault, Agamben holds that the fundamental division marking Western politics is not a racial one, but one between oikos and polis, private and public. From this, Agamben argues that this political division makes possible and so subtends the sovereign decision to exclude individuals from law by establishing a state of exception. The key point is that Agamben links sovereign violence to life by excluding the latter from the juridical order. The chapter concludes by critically evaluating Agamben’s proposals to overcome this.","PeriodicalId":319604,"journal":{"name":"Critiquing Sovereign Violence","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critiquing Sovereign Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474445283.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter focuses on Giorgio Agamben’s work on biopolitical sovereignty. It focuses on Homo Sacer and State of Exception to show that Agamben links sovereign violence to the establishment of a state of exception, wherein life is controlled through its exclusion from the juridical order. With this, Agamben continues the biopolitical line that sovereignty is orientated towards the regulation of life rather than the establishment of juridical order. The second part of the chapter ties this to Agamben’s discussion of civil war to argue that, contra Foucault, Agamben holds that the fundamental division marking Western politics is not a racial one, but one between oikos and polis, private and public. From this, Agamben argues that this political division makes possible and so subtends the sovereign decision to exclude individuals from law by establishing a state of exception. The key point is that Agamben links sovereign violence to life by excluding the latter from the juridical order. The chapter concludes by critically evaluating Agamben’s proposals to overcome this.
本章主要讨论乔治·阿甘本关于生命政治主权的著作。它将重点放在神圣人(Homo Sacer)和例外状态(State of Exception)上,以表明阿甘本将主权暴力与例外状态(State of Exception)的建立联系起来,在这种状态下,生活是通过将其排除在司法秩序之外来控制的。在此基础上,阿甘本继续了生命政治的路线,即主权的目标是对生活的规范,而不是建立司法秩序。本章的第二部分将此与阿甘本对内战的讨论联系起来,认为与福柯相反,阿甘本认为标志着西方政治的基本划分不是种族划分,而是oikos和polis,私人和公共之间的划分。由此,阿甘本认为,这种政治分裂使得通过建立例外状态将个人排除在法律之外的主权决定成为可能,并因此支持了这一决定。关键的一点是,阿甘本将主权暴力与生活联系起来,将后者排除在司法秩序之外。本章以批判性地评价阿甘本的建议来结束。