Alveolar Bone and Epithelial Attachment Status following Two Different Closed-eruption Surgical Techniques for Impacted Maxillary Central Incisors: A Recent Study

E. Sfeir, Mona Gholmieh, Zouhair Skaf, A. Mourad
{"title":"Alveolar Bone and Epithelial Attachment Status following Two Different Closed-eruption Surgical Techniques for Impacted Maxillary Central Incisors: A Recent Study","authors":"E. Sfeir, Mona Gholmieh, Zouhair Skaf, A. Mourad","doi":"10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v16/4440f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: For the treatment of upper impacted central incisors (ICIs), two main surgical approaches are typically described: open and closed. The closed-eruption surgical method (CEST) is currently the most popular because it provides the best esthetic and periodontal benefits. The purpose of this study was to see how traction discontinuation affected maxillary central incisor sulcal depth and alveolar bone ridge levels when compared to contralateral incisors when CEST was used. \nMaterials and Methods: CEST was used to treat 28 unilaterally impacted maxillary central incisors. At the time of crown emergence, thirteen teeth were subjected to a month of traction interruption, whereas 15 teeth were subjected to continuous traction. The ICIs and contralateral central incisors (CCIs) were subjected to periapical digital X-rays, anterosuperior cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning, and periodontal probing one year following treatment. The CCI measurements were utilized as a reference, and the Student's t-test was employed to see if there was a statistically significant difference between continuous and interrupted tractions. \nResults: Only the following measurements showed a statistically significant difference between the two techniques: Mesial probing (p-value 0.039352), labial bone level (p-value 2.58E-08), and palatal bone level (p-value 2.56E-06). \nLimitations: To draw more robust conclusions, a larger sample size and longer term follow-up are required. \nConclusion: On ICIs, a temporary discontinuation during tooth traction appears to improve treatment outcome. Technical modifications and the use of a temporary interruption during tooth traction can result in better treatment outcomes. \nClinical significance: \n \nThe CEST leads to the best periodontal status for ICIs. \nThe discontinuation of traction at the emergence of the tooth allows the supracrestal fibers to insert into the cement in a proper way.","PeriodicalId":436259,"journal":{"name":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 16","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 16","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v16/4440f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: For the treatment of upper impacted central incisors (ICIs), two main surgical approaches are typically described: open and closed. The closed-eruption surgical method (CEST) is currently the most popular because it provides the best esthetic and periodontal benefits. The purpose of this study was to see how traction discontinuation affected maxillary central incisor sulcal depth and alveolar bone ridge levels when compared to contralateral incisors when CEST was used. Materials and Methods: CEST was used to treat 28 unilaterally impacted maxillary central incisors. At the time of crown emergence, thirteen teeth were subjected to a month of traction interruption, whereas 15 teeth were subjected to continuous traction. The ICIs and contralateral central incisors (CCIs) were subjected to periapical digital X-rays, anterosuperior cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanning, and periodontal probing one year following treatment. The CCI measurements were utilized as a reference, and the Student's t-test was employed to see if there was a statistically significant difference between continuous and interrupted tractions. Results: Only the following measurements showed a statistically significant difference between the two techniques: Mesial probing (p-value 0.039352), labial bone level (p-value 2.58E-08), and palatal bone level (p-value 2.56E-06). Limitations: To draw more robust conclusions, a larger sample size and longer term follow-up are required. Conclusion: On ICIs, a temporary discontinuation during tooth traction appears to improve treatment outcome. Technical modifications and the use of a temporary interruption during tooth traction can result in better treatment outcomes. Clinical significance: The CEST leads to the best periodontal status for ICIs. The discontinuation of traction at the emergence of the tooth allows the supracrestal fibers to insert into the cement in a proper way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上颌中切牙阻生两种不同的闭式爆发手术技术后牙槽骨和上皮附着状态的最新研究
目的:对于上阻生中切牙(ICIs)的治疗,有两种主要的手术入路:开放和封闭。封闭出疹手术方法(CEST)是目前最流行的,因为它提供了最好的美学和牙周的好处。本研究的目的是观察当使用CEST时,与对侧切牙相比,牵引中断对上颌中切牙沟深度和牙槽骨脊水平的影响。材料与方法:应用CEST治疗单侧阻生上颌中切牙28例。在冠出牙时,13颗牙齿进行了一个月的牵引中断,而15颗牙齿进行了持续牵引。治疗一年后,对中切牙和对侧中切牙进行根尖周数字x线、前上锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和牙周探诊。CCI测量值作为参考,并采用学生t检验来查看连续牵引和中断牵引之间是否存在统计学显著差异。结果:两种技术之间只有以下测量值有统计学差异:中端探探(p值为0.039352)、唇骨水平(p值为2.58E-08)和腭骨水平(p值为2.56E-06)。局限性:为了得出更有力的结论,需要更大的样本量和更长期的随访。结论:在使用ICIs时,牙牵引时暂时停药可改善治疗效果。技术改进和在牙齿牵引期间使用暂时中断可以获得更好的治疗结果。临床意义:CEST可使ICIs的牙周状态达到最佳。在出牙时停止牵引,可使骨上纤维以适当的方式插入骨水泥中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Clinicopathological Study of Cervical Cancer A Review and Update on Clinical Management on Burning Mouth Syndrome Investigating the Effects of Standardised Treatment Protocols for Opportunistic Infection in Children Living with HIV/AIDS on Their Clinical Profile Study on Nasopalatine Duct Cyst: A Common Lesion with Uncommon Presentation in a Young Girl Alveolar Bone and Epithelial Attachment Status following Two Different Closed-eruption Surgical Techniques for Impacted Maxillary Central Incisors: A Recent Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1