Relationship between one individual and another - relationship between the individual and society: limitations in the formation of psychotic disturbances.

Abstract

The relations of the individual to others and family are understood through 'intersubjective' and/or 'interfamiliar' concepts. This 'inter' is always the origin of the relations between subjects; it is a reality which is of an atmospheric pneumatic nature. Its creative power and the uniqueness of the word are clarified by a selection of examples from oriental and occidental cultures. In contrast to it, the relations of the individual are also determined by norms, in which the 'objektive Geist' (Hegel) of a particular time is manifested. The individual is, in this relation, first of all a carrier of roles. A conditional analysis of psychotic disturbances must be based on the concept that the individual's psyche, in both spheres, is not a 'tabula rasa' (Locke), but always conveys a selection of that which has been offered in the situation (Leibniz). Out of this come constellations of a conditional nature conductive to the development of endogenous psychoses which exhibit themselves in the inter-sphere and role-sphere. These can only develop where a coherence of specific personality-structures with specific situations occurs. What makes various situations pathogenic for a particular, predisposed type, is a specific inference of meaning from peristatic precipitations.