SAT-based Model Checking: Interpolation, IC3, and Beyond

O. Grumberg, Sharon Shoham, Y. Vizel
{"title":"SAT-based Model Checking: Interpolation, IC3, and Beyond","authors":"O. Grumberg, Sharon Shoham, Y. Vizel","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-385-8-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SAT-based model checking is currently one of the most successful approaches to checking very large systems. In its early days, SAT-based (bounded) model checking was mainly used for bug hunting. The introduction of interpolation and IC3\\PDR enable efficient complete algorithms that can provide full verification as well. In this paper, we survey several approaches to enhancing SAT-based model checking. They are all based on iteratively computing an overapproximation of the set of reachable system states. They use different mechanisms to achieve scalability and faster convergence. The first one uses interpolation sequence rather than interpolation in order to obtain a more precise over-approximation of the set of reachable states. The other approach integrates lazy abstraction with IC3 in order to achieve scalability. Lazy abstraction, originally developed for software model checking, is a specific type of abstraction that allows hiding different model details at different steps of the verification. We find the IC3 algorithm most suitable for lazy abstraction since its state traversal is performed by means of local reachability checks, each involving only two consecutive sets. A different abstraction can therefore be applied in each of the local checks. The survey focuses on hardware model checking, but the presented ideas can be extended to other systems as well.","PeriodicalId":319733,"journal":{"name":"Software Systems Safety","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software Systems Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-385-8-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SAT-based model checking is currently one of the most successful approaches to checking very large systems. In its early days, SAT-based (bounded) model checking was mainly used for bug hunting. The introduction of interpolation and IC3\PDR enable efficient complete algorithms that can provide full verification as well. In this paper, we survey several approaches to enhancing SAT-based model checking. They are all based on iteratively computing an overapproximation of the set of reachable system states. They use different mechanisms to achieve scalability and faster convergence. The first one uses interpolation sequence rather than interpolation in order to obtain a more precise over-approximation of the set of reachable states. The other approach integrates lazy abstraction with IC3 in order to achieve scalability. Lazy abstraction, originally developed for software model checking, is a specific type of abstraction that allows hiding different model details at different steps of the verification. We find the IC3 algorithm most suitable for lazy abstraction since its state traversal is performed by means of local reachability checks, each involving only two consecutive sets. A different abstraction can therefore be applied in each of the local checks. The survey focuses on hardware model checking, but the presented ideas can be extended to other systems as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于sat的模型检查:插值,IC3和超越
基于sat的模型检查是目前检查大型系统最成功的方法之一。在早期,基于sat的(有界的)模型检查主要用于查找bug。插值和IC3\PDR的引入使高效完整的算法能够提供完整的验证。本文综述了几种增强基于sat的模型检验的方法。它们都是基于迭代计算可达系统状态集的过近似值。它们使用不同的机制来实现可伸缩性和更快的收敛。第一种方法使用插值序列而不是插值,以获得更精确的可达状态集的过逼近。另一种方法将惰性抽象与IC3集成,以实现可伸缩性。惰性抽象,最初是为软件模型检查而开发的,是一种特定类型的抽象,它允许在验证的不同步骤隐藏不同的模型细节。我们发现IC3算法最适合惰性抽象,因为它的状态遍历是通过局部可达性检查来执行的,每个检查只涉及两个连续的集合。因此,可以在每个局部检查中应用不同的抽象。该调查侧重于硬件模型检查,但所提出的思想也可以扩展到其他系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applications of Interactive Proof to Data Flow Analysis and Security SAT-based Model Checking: Interpolation, IC3, and Beyond Frameworks for Interprocedural Analysis of Concurrent Programs May/Must Abstraction-Based Software Model Checking for Sound Verification and Falsification Probabilistic Model Checking for Biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1