A Generalized Heckman Model With Varying Sample Selection Bias and Dispersion Parameters

F. D. S. Bastos, W. Barreto‐Souza, M. Genton
{"title":"A Generalized Heckman Model With Varying Sample Selection Bias and Dispersion Parameters","authors":"F. D. S. Bastos, W. Barreto‐Souza, M. Genton","doi":"10.5705/SS.202021.0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many proposals have emerged as alternatives to the Heckman selection model, mainly to address the non-robustness of its normal assumption. The 2001 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data is often used to illustrate this non-robustness of the Heckman model. In this paper, we propose a generalization of the Heckman sample selection model by allowing the sample selection bias and dispersion parameters to depend on covariates. We show that the non-robustness of the Heckman model may be due to the assumption of the constant sample selection bias parameter rather than the normality assumption. Our proposed methodology allows us to understand which covariates are important to explain the sample selection bias phenomenon rather than to only form conclusions about its presence. We explore the inferential aspects of the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) for our proposed generalized Heckman model. More specifically, we show that this model satisfies some regularity conditions such that it ensures consistency and asymptotic normality of the MLEs. Proper score residuals for sample selection models are provided, and model adequacy is addressed. Simulated results are presented to check the finite-sample behavior of the estimators and to verify the consequences of not considering varying sample selection bias and dispersion parameters. We show that the normal assumption for analyzing medical expenditure data is suitable and that the conclusions drawn using our approach are coherent with findings from prior literature. Moreover, we identify which covariates are relevant to explain the presence of sample selection bias in this important dataset.","PeriodicalId":186390,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Methodology","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5705/SS.202021.0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many proposals have emerged as alternatives to the Heckman selection model, mainly to address the non-robustness of its normal assumption. The 2001 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data is often used to illustrate this non-robustness of the Heckman model. In this paper, we propose a generalization of the Heckman sample selection model by allowing the sample selection bias and dispersion parameters to depend on covariates. We show that the non-robustness of the Heckman model may be due to the assumption of the constant sample selection bias parameter rather than the normality assumption. Our proposed methodology allows us to understand which covariates are important to explain the sample selection bias phenomenon rather than to only form conclusions about its presence. We explore the inferential aspects of the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) for our proposed generalized Heckman model. More specifically, we show that this model satisfies some regularity conditions such that it ensures consistency and asymptotic normality of the MLEs. Proper score residuals for sample selection models are provided, and model adequacy is addressed. Simulated results are presented to check the finite-sample behavior of the estimators and to verify the consequences of not considering varying sample selection bias and dispersion parameters. We show that the normal assumption for analyzing medical expenditure data is suitable and that the conclusions drawn using our approach are coherent with findings from prior literature. Moreover, we identify which covariates are relevant to explain the presence of sample selection bias in this important dataset.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有变样本选择偏差和色散参数的广义Heckman模型
作为赫克曼选择模型的替代方案,已经出现了许多建议,主要是为了解决其正常假设的非稳健性。2001年医疗支出小组调查的数据经常被用来说明赫克曼模型的这种非稳健性。在本文中,我们通过允许样本选择偏差和分散参数依赖于协变量,提出了Heckman样本选择模型的推广。我们表明Heckman模型的非鲁棒性可能是由于假设样本选择偏差参数恒定而不是正态性假设。我们提出的方法使我们能够理解哪些协变量对于解释样本选择偏差现象是重要的,而不是仅仅形成关于其存在的结论。我们探讨了我们提出的广义Heckman模型的极大似然估计(MLEs)的推理方面。更具体地说,我们证明了该模型满足一些正则性条件,从而保证了最大似然概率的一致性和渐近正态性。提供了样本选择模型的适当分数残差,并解决了模型充分性问题。给出了模拟结果来检查估计器的有限样本行为,并验证不考虑变化的样本选择偏差和分散参数的后果。我们表明,分析医疗支出数据的正常假设是合适的,并且使用我们的方法得出的结论与先前文献的发现是一致的。此外,我们确定了哪些协变量与解释这个重要数据集中样本选择偏差的存在相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Empirical Bayes Methods and Applications to Special Types of Data Flexible Bayesian modelling of concomitant covariate effects in mixture models A Critique of Differential Abundance Analysis, and Advocacy for an Alternative Post-Processing of MCMC Conditional variance estimator for sufficient dimension reduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1