Comparative study of pain perception in outpatient hysteroscopy analyzing previous orientation by multimedia

W. Pace, A. Pace, Andrea Alves Morato, F.A.N. Pereira, Gabriela Loiola Pace, João Oscar de Almeida Falcão Júnior
{"title":"Comparative study of pain perception in outpatient hysteroscopy analyzing previous orientation by multimedia","authors":"W. Pace, A. Pace, Andrea Alves Morato, F.A.N. Pereira, Gabriela Loiola Pace, João Oscar de Almeida Falcão Júnior","doi":"10.4322/hra.001019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"objectives: To evaluate the impact of previous guidance on the hysteroscopy exam using multimedia resources (film) compared to verbal orientations only, on the pain intensity perceived by the patient during hysteroscopy without anesthesia. Methods: Randomized clinical trial, which included 187 women, who were referred for hysteroscopy. The patients in the experimental group (89) watched an explanatory video just before the exam. The control group (98), however, received only routine verbal guidance about the exam. The degree of pain perceived by all patients was measured 1 and 5 minutes after the procedure using Visual Analog Scale. results: In the experimental group, 1 minute after the examination, 29.2% of the patients reported mild pain, 24.7% moderate pain and 46.1% severe pain. In the control group, 28.6% of the patients reported mild pain, 29.6% moderate pain and 41.8% severe pain. In the analysis 5 minutes after the examination of the experimental group 60.7% of the patients reported mild pain, 28.1% moderate pain and 11.2% severe pain and the control group 62.3% of the patients reported mild pain, 26.5% moderate pain and 11.2% severe pain. Conclusions: The study was not able to demonstrate the relationship of pain perceived by patients with prior multimedia orientation, thus that, more studies are needed.","PeriodicalId":179585,"journal":{"name":"Human Reproduction Archives","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Reproduction Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/hra.001019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

objectives: To evaluate the impact of previous guidance on the hysteroscopy exam using multimedia resources (film) compared to verbal orientations only, on the pain intensity perceived by the patient during hysteroscopy without anesthesia. Methods: Randomized clinical trial, which included 187 women, who were referred for hysteroscopy. The patients in the experimental group (89) watched an explanatory video just before the exam. The control group (98), however, received only routine verbal guidance about the exam. The degree of pain perceived by all patients was measured 1 and 5 minutes after the procedure using Visual Analog Scale. results: In the experimental group, 1 minute after the examination, 29.2% of the patients reported mild pain, 24.7% moderate pain and 46.1% severe pain. In the control group, 28.6% of the patients reported mild pain, 29.6% moderate pain and 41.8% severe pain. In the analysis 5 minutes after the examination of the experimental group 60.7% of the patients reported mild pain, 28.1% moderate pain and 11.2% severe pain and the control group 62.3% of the patients reported mild pain, 26.5% moderate pain and 11.2% severe pain. Conclusions: The study was not able to demonstrate the relationship of pain perceived by patients with prior multimedia orientation, thus that, more studies are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊宫腔镜患者疼痛感知的比较研究
目的:评价先前使用多媒体资源(电影)进行宫腔镜检查时的指导与仅使用口头指导相比,对患者在不麻醉的情况下宫腔镜检查时感受到的疼痛强度的影响。方法:随机临床试验纳入187例宫腔镜患者。实验组(89名)的患者在检查前观看了一段解释性视频。而对照组(98人)只接受了关于考试的常规口头指导。术后1分钟和5分钟用视觉模拟量表测量所有患者的疼痛程度。结果:实验组在检查后1分钟,29.2%的患者报告轻度疼痛,24.7%的患者报告中度疼痛,46.1%的患者报告重度疼痛。在对照组中,28.6%的患者报告轻度疼痛,29.6%的患者报告中度疼痛,41.8%的患者报告重度疼痛。在检查后5分钟的分析中,实验组60.7%的患者报告轻度疼痛,28.1%的患者报告中度疼痛,11.2%的患者报告重度疼痛,对照组62.3%的患者报告轻度疼痛,26.5%的患者报告中度疼痛,11.2%的患者报告重度疼痛。结论:本研究不能证明患者先前多媒体取向与疼痛感知的关系,因此需要更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hormonal contraception: Is it time to abandon estrogen? Investigation of in vivo and in vitro fertilization methods: a review of the literature Comparative study of pain perception in outpatient hysteroscopy analyzing previous orientation by multimedia Could endometriosis increase the severity of COVID-19 infection symptoms? Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: reviewing therapeutic approaches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1