The Torrone and the Prosecution of Crimes

S. Muurling
{"title":"The Torrone and the Prosecution of Crimes","authors":"S. Muurling","doi":"10.1163/9789004440593_004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 6 June 1654 a surgeon from one of Bologna’s hospitals reported Carlo Masina’s severe and ‘suspicious’ wounds to the criminal court.1 Upon interrogation, the dying Carlo pointed to three men (Domenico Pino, and Francesco and Alessandro Lambertini) and one woman (Diamante, Domenico’s wife) as the culprits. Earlier, Carlo had seen Domenico talking to ‘certain persons’ in one of the city’s many taverns and had mentioned that his behaviour did not befit a gentiluomo (gentleman), but a becco fotuto (fucking cuckold). Their quarrel escalated a day later when Domenico was waiting for him with a drawn sword, accompanied by his wife Diamante and the Lambertini brothers. When Carlo tried to duck the stones Diamante and the brothers were throwing at him, Domenico struck him with his sword, causing wounds which would eventually prove fatal for Carlo. Domenico was able to turn the capital punishment he received into a pardon through a peace accord with Carlo’s kin and the Lambertini brothers were exiled. Although her role in the homicide was similar to that of the brothers, no sentence is recorded for Diamante. While the criminal court records do not provide any information as to why Diamante got off so lightly compared to her male co-offenders, perceptions of gender may well have been at play. After all, differences in recorded and prosecuted crime are linked to moral and legal norms, which differed according to offence category as well as the ‘quality’ of the offender and victim – gender being one of the constituents that magistrates took into consideration when judging a crime. This chapter examines the relationship between criminal prosecution patterns and gender in early modern urban Bologna through the lens of the authorities. By examining both normative writings such as the city’s criminal bylaws and a sample of the Tribunale del Torrone’s investigation dossiers (processi), it sheds light on the legal attitudes and practices of prosecution that played a significant role in shaping women’s formal encounters with the law in urban Bologna. This chapter begins with an overview of the legal landscape and the organisation of the criminal justice system in early modern Bologna. It then discusses how criminal justice was administered, what procedures it followed and what prosecutorial priorities it established in the criminal bylaws. This will reveal that although the procedures and laws in themselves may appear relatively","PeriodicalId":309487,"journal":{"name":"Everyday Crime, Criminal Justice and Gender in Early Modern Bologna","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Everyday Crime, Criminal Justice and Gender in Early Modern Bologna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004440593_004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 6 June 1654 a surgeon from one of Bologna’s hospitals reported Carlo Masina’s severe and ‘suspicious’ wounds to the criminal court.1 Upon interrogation, the dying Carlo pointed to three men (Domenico Pino, and Francesco and Alessandro Lambertini) and one woman (Diamante, Domenico’s wife) as the culprits. Earlier, Carlo had seen Domenico talking to ‘certain persons’ in one of the city’s many taverns and had mentioned that his behaviour did not befit a gentiluomo (gentleman), but a becco fotuto (fucking cuckold). Their quarrel escalated a day later when Domenico was waiting for him with a drawn sword, accompanied by his wife Diamante and the Lambertini brothers. When Carlo tried to duck the stones Diamante and the brothers were throwing at him, Domenico struck him with his sword, causing wounds which would eventually prove fatal for Carlo. Domenico was able to turn the capital punishment he received into a pardon through a peace accord with Carlo’s kin and the Lambertini brothers were exiled. Although her role in the homicide was similar to that of the brothers, no sentence is recorded for Diamante. While the criminal court records do not provide any information as to why Diamante got off so lightly compared to her male co-offenders, perceptions of gender may well have been at play. After all, differences in recorded and prosecuted crime are linked to moral and legal norms, which differed according to offence category as well as the ‘quality’ of the offender and victim – gender being one of the constituents that magistrates took into consideration when judging a crime. This chapter examines the relationship between criminal prosecution patterns and gender in early modern urban Bologna through the lens of the authorities. By examining both normative writings such as the city’s criminal bylaws and a sample of the Tribunale del Torrone’s investigation dossiers (processi), it sheds light on the legal attitudes and practices of prosecution that played a significant role in shaping women’s formal encounters with the law in urban Bologna. This chapter begins with an overview of the legal landscape and the organisation of the criminal justice system in early modern Bologna. It then discusses how criminal justice was administered, what procedures it followed and what prosecutorial priorities it established in the criminal bylaws. This will reveal that although the procedures and laws in themselves may appear relatively
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Torrone和对犯罪的起诉
1654年6月6日,博洛尼亚一家医院的一名外科医生向刑事法庭报告了卡洛·马西纳严重的“可疑”伤口在审讯中,垂死的卡罗指出三个男人(多梅尼科·皮诺、弗朗西斯科和亚历山德罗·兰伯蒂尼)和一个女人(多梅尼科的妻子迪亚曼特)是罪犯。早些时候,卡罗看见多梅尼科在城里的一家小酒馆里和“某些人”说话,就说他的行为不像绅士,而像个戴绿帽子的人。一天后,当多梅尼科在妻子迪亚曼特和兰伯蒂尼兄弟的陪同下,拿着一把拔出的剑等着他时,他们的争吵升级了。当卡罗试图躲避迪亚曼特和兄弟们扔向他的石头时,多梅尼科用剑击中了他,造成了卡罗致命的伤口。多梅尼科通过与卡罗的亲属达成和平协议,将他收到的死刑变成了赦免,兰伯蒂尼兄弟被流放。虽然她在谋杀案中的角色与两兄弟相似,但戴曼特没有被判刑。虽然刑事法庭记录没有提供任何信息,说明为什么与她的男性共犯相比,迪亚曼特受到的惩罚如此之轻,但性别观念很可能在起作用。毕竟,记录和起诉犯罪的差异与道德和法律规范有关,这些规范根据犯罪类别以及罪犯和受害者的“素质”而有所不同-性别是治安法官在判断犯罪时考虑的因素之一。本章通过当局的视角考察近代早期博洛尼亚城市的刑事起诉模式与性别之间的关系。通过研究城市刑事条例等规范性著作和托罗内法庭调查档案(过程)的样本,它揭示了在塑造博洛尼亚城市妇女与法律的正式接触方面发挥重要作用的法律态度和起诉做法。本章开始与法律景观的概述和刑事司法系统的组织在早期现代博洛尼亚。然后讨论如何执行刑事司法,遵循什么程序以及在刑事条例中确定了哪些起诉优先事项。这将揭示,虽然程序和法律本身可能出现相对
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Torrone and the Prosecution of Crimes Theft and Its Prosecution Appendix: Information on Samples Violence and the Politics of Everyday Life Conclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1