Gestalt, the Good and the concept of Ethical Presence

Marie‐Anne Chidiac, Sally Denham‐Vaughan
{"title":"Gestalt, the Good and the concept of Ethical Presence","authors":"Marie‐Anne Chidiac, Sally Denham‐Vaughan","doi":"10.53667/zmwl8321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Building on the core Relational Change ‘SOS’ framework and the central notion of presence, this paper makes the case for introducing a new concept of Ethical Presence as a foundational orientating principle for relational and Gestalt praxis. It begins by highlighting the risks of harm and evil in polarising presence and dismissing aspects of power and privilege that are frequently lying implicitly alongside notions of presence. This in turn leads to an examination of Lewin’s core organising principle that ‘needs organise the field’ from a dialogic as well as phenomenological perspective, which results in a relational reformulation. Ethical Presence is a concept that synthesises the dialectic of egological and ecological self-organisation while attending to others and the situation. Finally, the paper proposes that practitioners reflexively inquire, through the elevation of a dialogic and field orientated stance, and assess the presence of themselves and others since, when I judge myself as ‘present’, an ecological ethical perspective asks what factors in the wider field (power, privilege, etc.) support me to be that way? Keywords: ethics, presence, Ethical Presence, ecological, egological, relational, Gestalt, evil, Lewin.","PeriodicalId":103162,"journal":{"name":"British Gestalt Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Gestalt Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53667/zmwl8321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract: Building on the core Relational Change ‘SOS’ framework and the central notion of presence, this paper makes the case for introducing a new concept of Ethical Presence as a foundational orientating principle for relational and Gestalt praxis. It begins by highlighting the risks of harm and evil in polarising presence and dismissing aspects of power and privilege that are frequently lying implicitly alongside notions of presence. This in turn leads to an examination of Lewin’s core organising principle that ‘needs organise the field’ from a dialogic as well as phenomenological perspective, which results in a relational reformulation. Ethical Presence is a concept that synthesises the dialectic of egological and ecological self-organisation while attending to others and the situation. Finally, the paper proposes that practitioners reflexively inquire, through the elevation of a dialogic and field orientated stance, and assess the presence of themselves and others since, when I judge myself as ‘present’, an ecological ethical perspective asks what factors in the wider field (power, privilege, etc.) support me to be that way? Keywords: ethics, presence, Ethical Presence, ecological, egological, relational, Gestalt, evil, Lewin.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格式塔,善和伦理存在的概念
摘要:基于核心的关系变化“SOS”框架和在场的中心概念,本文引入了一个新的伦理在场概念,作为关系和格式塔实践的基本取向原则。它首先强调了两极分化存在的危害和邪恶的风险,并驳斥了权力和特权的方面,这些方面通常隐含在存在的概念旁边。这反过来又导致了从对话和现象学的角度对Lewin的核心组织原则“需要组织领域”的检查,这导致了关系的重新表述。伦理在场是在关注他人和处境的同时,综合了自我组织和生态自我组织的辩证法的概念。最后,本文建议实践者反思性地询问,通过对话和场域导向立场的提升,并评估自己和他人的存在,因为当我判断自己“在场”时,生态伦理视角会问,在更广泛的领域(权力、特权等)中有哪些因素支持我这样做?关键词:伦理、在场、伦理在场、生态、自我、关系、格式塔、恶、卢因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards a relational/compassionate Gestalt understanding of trauma and addiction In and out the gender pail Gaslighting: how does a plant survive on fake watering? Artistic creativity as a resource in the work of the psychological support group of Kharkiv Institute of Gestalt and Psychodrama during wartime The Cure: working with separation and loss through song parody (lyric substitution)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1