Sharing Research Amidst the Cat Videos and Clickbait

Benjamin Toff
{"title":"Sharing Research Amidst the Cat Videos and Clickbait","authors":"Benjamin Toff","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780197538470.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter makes the case that the task of engagement for journalism researchers is far more challenging than is typically appreciated. Even provocative research findings must ruthlessly compete for the attention of highly distracted audiences. This chapter outlines results from a small study examining relative rates of social media interactions (e.g., comments, shares, and likes) on Facebook posts made by three organizations that seek to bridge the divide between academia and professional communities of practice—the Columbia Journalism Review, Nieman Journalism Lab, and the Poynter Institute. Analysis of what posts do (and do not) receive attention show that although some scholarly research attracts engagement, it pales in comparison to other posts circulated by these same organizations. The findings suggest that translating research in the contemporary media environment requires more innovative and proactive outreach strategies.","PeriodicalId":183860,"journal":{"name":"Journalism Research That Matters","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journalism Research That Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780197538470.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter makes the case that the task of engagement for journalism researchers is far more challenging than is typically appreciated. Even provocative research findings must ruthlessly compete for the attention of highly distracted audiences. This chapter outlines results from a small study examining relative rates of social media interactions (e.g., comments, shares, and likes) on Facebook posts made by three organizations that seek to bridge the divide between academia and professional communities of practice—the Columbia Journalism Review, Nieman Journalism Lab, and the Poynter Institute. Analysis of what posts do (and do not) receive attention show that although some scholarly research attracts engagement, it pales in comparison to other posts circulated by these same organizations. The findings suggest that translating research in the contemporary media environment requires more innovative and proactive outreach strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在猫咪视频和标题党中分享研究
本章说明,新闻研究人员参与的任务远比通常所认为的更具挑战性。即使是挑衅性的研究结果也必须无情地争夺高度分心的观众的注意力。本章概述了一项小型研究的结果,该研究考察了Facebook帖子上社交媒体互动的相对比率(例如,评论、分享和点赞),该研究由三个组织——哥伦比亚新闻评论、尼曼新闻实验室和波因特研究所——所做,这些组织试图弥合学术界和专业实践社区之间的鸿沟。对哪些帖子受关注(哪些帖子不受关注)的分析表明,尽管一些学术研究吸引了人们的关注,但与这些组织传播的其他帖子相比,这些研究就相形见绌了。研究结果表明,当代媒体环境下的翻译研究需要更具创新性和主动性的外联策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Improving Journalism with Academic Research Sharing Research Amidst the Cat Videos and Clickbait What Journalism Researchers Should Be Doing Why News Literacy Matters Would We Do It Again?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1