Is the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio a good marker for the differential diagnosis of unstable angina pectoris and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction?

{"title":"Is the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio a good marker for the differential diagnosis of unstable angina pectoris and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction?","authors":"","doi":"10.51271/kmj-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the role of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the differential diagnosis of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina pectoris (USAP). \nMaterial and Method: Patients who had been admitted to the emergency ward with complaints of chest pain and who were diagnosed with USAP and NSTEMI in further examination were retrospectively included in this study. The NLR level was measured for each patient both at the times of application and of discharge. The NLR was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count by the lymphocyte count. \nResults: WBC (8107.38±1405.5 vs 7452.46±1427.9, p: 0.020), neutrophil (5620 vs 4300, p: 0.001), and NLR (3.86 vs 2.14, p: 0.001) values were higher, whereas the lymphocyte value (1505 vs 2100, p: 0.001) was lower in the NSTEMI versus the USAP group. According to the multivariable logistic regression analysis that was done, NLR appeared to be an independent predictor of NSTEMI. The predictive value of NLR for NSTEMI diagnosis was >3.22 with 61.9% sensitivity and 86.96% specificity (74.3% positive predictive, 78.9% negative predictive) (AUC: 0.761; p< 0.001). \nConclusion: As a cheap inexpensive and easy-to-calculate index that can be applied in every medical establishment within the first 20 minutes of application, it is possible to state that NLR is a good marker in distinguishing NSTEMI from USAP patients.","PeriodicalId":369732,"journal":{"name":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","volume":"259 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51271/kmj-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the role of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the differential diagnosis of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina pectoris (USAP). Material and Method: Patients who had been admitted to the emergency ward with complaints of chest pain and who were diagnosed with USAP and NSTEMI in further examination were retrospectively included in this study. The NLR level was measured for each patient both at the times of application and of discharge. The NLR was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count by the lymphocyte count. Results: WBC (8107.38±1405.5 vs 7452.46±1427.9, p: 0.020), neutrophil (5620 vs 4300, p: 0.001), and NLR (3.86 vs 2.14, p: 0.001) values were higher, whereas the lymphocyte value (1505 vs 2100, p: 0.001) was lower in the NSTEMI versus the USAP group. According to the multivariable logistic regression analysis that was done, NLR appeared to be an independent predictor of NSTEMI. The predictive value of NLR for NSTEMI diagnosis was >3.22 with 61.9% sensitivity and 86.96% specificity (74.3% positive predictive, 78.9% negative predictive) (AUC: 0.761; p< 0.001). Conclusion: As a cheap inexpensive and easy-to-calculate index that can be applied in every medical establishment within the first 20 minutes of application, it is possible to state that NLR is a good marker in distinguishing NSTEMI from USAP patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值是鉴别不稳定型心绞痛和非st段抬高型心肌梗死的良好指标吗?
背景:本研究旨在探讨中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值(NLR)在非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和不稳定型心绞痛(USAP)鉴别诊断中的作用。材料和方法:本研究回顾性纳入了因胸痛主诉入住急诊科并经进一步检查诊断为USAP和NSTEMI的患者。在应用和出院时测量每位患者的NLR水平。NLR由中性粒细胞计数除以淋巴细胞计数计算。结果:与USAP组相比,NSTEMI组WBC(8107.38±1405.5 vs 7452.46±1427.9,p: 0.020)、中性粒细胞(5620 vs 4300, p: 0.001)和NLR (3.86 vs 2.14, p: 0.001)值较高,而淋巴细胞值(1505 vs 2100, p: 0.001)较低。根据所做的多变量logistic回归分析,NLR似乎是NSTEMI的独立预测因子。NLR对NSTEMI诊断的预测值为bb0.3.22,敏感性61.9%,特异性86.96%(阳性预测74.3%,阴性预测78.9%)(AUC: 0.761;p < 0.001)。结论:NLR作为一种价格低廉且易于计算的指标,可在应用前20分钟内应用于每个医疗机构,可以说是区分NSTEMI和USAP患者的良好指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health follow-up visits of children with autism How much did the February 6 earthquakes affect a distant hospital? The effect of general anesthesia applied during cesarean section on newborn bilirubin Ultrasound-guided neuromonitoring methods in the intensive care unit Pulmonary candidiasis presenting as tumor-like shadow
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1